asks leave, 6;
reports on amendments of the House to Senate’s bill authorizing the President to take possession of Louisiana, 8;
on the merits of the Louisiana treaty, 16.
См. Указатель, т. 2.
Взятничество. — См. Указатель, т. 1.
Brice, Nicholas, his testimony for the defence on the trial of Judge Chase, 228.
Bridge over the Potomac, bill postponed, 374.
См. Потомакский мост.
British Aggressions on our Commerce, message from the President relative to, in Senate, 353;
report of the committee on the message considered, 355;
first resolution passed, 355.
Вторая резолюция, касающаяся требования о возвращении имущества и т. д. и принятия мер относительно насильственного набора матросов, рассмотрена, 355;
impropriety of agreeing to the resolution arising from all the circumstances of the case, 356;
this resolution predicated on the principle of the first, which passed unanimously, 356;
language of the resolution not too strong, 356;
the principle of the resolution considered, 357;
the resolution shelters the Executive from the responsibility which ought to attach to its measures, 357;
it demonstrates the union of the different branches of the Government on the subject, 357;
the resolution will bear the character of advice to the President, 357;
we should reflect upon this step, 357;
object of the resolution, 358;
motion to recommit to a special committee, 358;
objections to the resolution in its present shape, 358;
motion to recommit lost, 358;
Сенату подобает занять более жесткую позицию и принять энергичные меры до обращения к Президенту с просьбой о переговорах, 359;
negotiation not exhausted, 359;
два возражения против резолюции: осуждение Президента и принесение в жертву чести и интересов Соединенных Штатов, 359;
these considered, 359;
resolution carried, 359.
Third resolution considered, 369;
первая резолюция является декларацией наших нейтральных прав, вторая просит Президента направить специального министра в Англию и т. д., третья предлагает запретить ввоз определенных британских товаров, если не будет получено возмещение, 369;
it is designed to aid negotiation, 369;
Великобритания запрещает ввоз наших товаров, и как она может расценивать это как военную меру? 369.
В Палате. — Резолюция с требованием к Президенту предоставить копию его прокламации, закрывающей наши порты и гавани для вооруженных судов Великобритании, 617;
no necessity for the measure, 617;
it has been published in all the newspapers, 617;
the former practice, 617;
this opposition to the motion unaccountable, 618;
не содержится в отчете комитета, поскольку считалось достаточно официальным в газетах, 618;
resolution adopted, 619;
copy of Proclamation, 619;
report of committee on the report, 621.
British Treaty, deficiency in the appropriation to carry out the seventh article, 287.
См. Указатель, т. 1.
Broom, James M., Representative from Delaware, 383, 493;
on laying a tax on imported slaves, 390;
on securing the privilege of the Habeas Corpus, 520, 526.
Brown, John, Senator from Kentucky, 3, 165;
elected President pro tem. of Senate, 3;
on rules of the Senate relative to separate readings of resolutions, 7;
submits to Senate a question of order, 21;
elected President pro tem. of Senate, 41.
См. Указатель, тт. 1 и 2.
Brown, Obadiah B., elected chaplain of the House, 614.
Brown, Robert, Representative from Pennsylvania, 50, 286, 377, 493, 612.
См. Указатель, т. 2.
Bryan, Joseph, Representative from Georgia, 79, 286, 379.
Burr, Aaron, as Vice President presides in Senate, 38;
Vice President presides over the Senate, 163;
franking privilege denied, 168;
farewell address to the Senate, 169; note, 170.
См. Указатель, тт. 1 и 2.
Burwell, William A., Representative from Virginia, 493, 613;
on rejection of the bill from the Senate suspending the Habeas Corpus, 504;
on securing the privilege of the Habeas Corpus, 522;
on British aggressions, 618;
on inquiry into the conduct of General Wilkinson, 646;
on naturalization laws, 659;
on suspension of the act of non-importation, 709.
Butler, Pierce, Senator from South Carolina, 6;
reports on amendment to the constitution, 7;
offers amendment to limit eligibility to Presidency, 7;
on the eligibility only of natives to the Presidency, 21;
resigns, 165.
См. Указатель, т. 1.
Butler, William, Representative from South Carolina, 51, 207, 378, 493, 613.
C
Calhoun, Joseph, Representative from South Carolina, 613.
Campbell, George W., Representative from Tennessee, 51, 285, 378, 613;
on the amendment to the constitution relative to the election of President, 58, 60;
on postage on newspapers, 78;
on the resolution relative to public roads, 83;
on the resolution to inquire into the official conduct of Judge Chase, 94;
on the government of Louisiana, 152;
continues the argument for the prosecution on the trial of Judge Chase, 232;
on improving the navigation of the Potomac, 291;
on the establishment of post roads, 338;
on importations from Great Britain, 451;
on the appropriation to build gunboats, 517;
on securing the privilege of the Habeas Corpus, 531;
on fortifications and gunboats, 638;
on removal of the federal judges, 675;
on suspension of the embargo act, 677;
on suspension of the act, 693.
Campbell, John, Representative from Maryland, 50, 286, 377, 493, 612.
См. Указатель, т. 2.
Carlton, Peter, Representative from New Hampshire, 612.
Carondelet, his letter relative to money for General Wilkinson, 642.
Casey, Levi, Representative from South Carolina, 51, 287, 378, 494;
decease announced, 491, 515.
Перепись Союза. — См. Указатель, т. 1.
Chamberlain, William, Representative from Vermont, 50, 285.
Champion, Epaphroditus, Representative from Connecticut, 612.
Chandler, John, Representative from Massachusetts, 377, 493, 612;
on importations from Great Britain, 462;
on building gunboats, 627;
on inquiry into the conduct of General Wilkinson, 645.
Благотворительные цели. — См. Указатель, т. 1.
Charlestown, Virginia, petition of inhabitants for a port of entry, 407;
report of committee of commerce, 409;
facts in the case, 409;
report agreed to, 409.
Chase, Judge, official conduct of considered in the House, 88;
ни у одного народа нет такого чувства важности сохранения не запятнанными источников правосудия, как у граждан Соединенных Штатов, 88;
hence the independence of the judges under the constitution, 88;
предложена резолюция о назначении комитета для расследования официального поведения Сэмюэла Чейза и того, действовал ли он в своем судебном качестве так, что требуется задействовать конституционную власть Палаты, 89;
призывают проголосовать за расследование поведения судьи без предоставления каких-либо фактов, указывающих на необходимость такого расследования, 89;
to adopt the resolution in its present form would be a vote of censure on the Judge, 89;
parties aggrieved, or members cognizant of the facts, should bring up the measure, 89;
statement of facts made at last session, 89;
occasion of that statement, 90;
a statement of the facts occurring in Pennsylvania, 90;
это первый случай, когда предложение о назначении следственного комитета по поводу официального поведения государственного служащего встретило возражения, 90;
this House the constitutional guardians of the morality of the judiciary, 90;
character of the Judge involved by this discussion, 90;
the conviction of any one member of the propriety of this measure cannot warrant the House in taking this step, 90;
the statement of facts is not founded on personal knowledge, 91;
hearsay should never be the ground for instituting an inquiry, 91;
action should be delayed until such facts are disclosed as will justify the step, 91;
целесообразность расследования не может быть усмотрена без доказательств, а какова цель расследования, как не получение доказательств? 91;
if the inquiry cannot be had without the evidence, both must be dropped, 91;
no impropriety in giving the case the same direction as all other business of the House, 91;
не представляется правильным ставить под сомнение репутацию государственного служащего, если предварительно не обнаружится какая-либо необходимость, 92;
no precedents adduced which apply to this case, 92;
case of Judge Pickering, 92;
the course proposed inverts the natural order of things, being an inquiry for and not out of facts, 92;
facts stated not sufficient for impeachment, 93;
основания должны быть изложены в форме резолюции, и такая резолюция должна быть передана в комитет для расследования, 93;
we have the same right to impeach the President, yet it would be improper without facts, 93;
question of adjournment moved and lost, 93;
postponement desired, to afford time for reflection, 94;
we should proceed cautiously in this matter, 94;
before the vote for an inquiry there should be probable grounds that facts exist to authorize such a procedure, 94;
improper to go into such an inquiry before specific charges are laid before the House, 94;
reasons for proceeding in what is termed so precipitate a manner, 95;
all objections are applicable to a motion for impeachment only, 95;
committee rose, 95;
amendment moved to insert also the name of Judge Richard Peters in the resolution, 96;
only a committee is asked to receive evidence, and determine whether it affords grounds for an impeachment, 96;
no way more favorable to the person implicated, 96;
on the request of a member for a committee of inquiry, that measure ought to be adopted, 96;
прецеденты не обязательны;
reason and common sense are all that is necessary to guide to a decision, 97;
British annals are full, 97;
case of the Earl of Strafford, 97;
it is notorious that Fries was tried for his life without being heard, 97;
Peters equally guilty with Judge Chase—amendment carried, 98;
let the facts be laid before the House, 98;
otherwise we shall legislate on the opinion of a member, 98;
талантливые люди не займут мест на скамье подсудимых, если их репутация может подвергаться проверке без предварительного предоставления каких-либо фактов, 98;
any member may procure an investigating committee if this resolution pass, 98;
under the circumstances, the measure is improper in every point of view, 99;
arguments of the opposition turn on the ground of expediency and precedent, 99;
its expediency argued, 99;
precedents considered, 99;
resolution objected to because of the indelicacy of implicating the character of a judge, 100;
all independence has its limits, 101;
is not this House under a solemn oath for the faithful discharge of this and every other duty, 101;
other objections considered, 102;
reasons for every member to vote for the resolution, 102;
эта Палата является главным следственным органом нации, в обязанность которого входит расследование по надлежащему представлению поведения каждого должностного лица, 103;
it is the duty of a grand jury to inquire who is guilty, 103;
in England common report has been considered sufficient authority for similar inquiries, 103;
not necessary that the House should be acquainted with any facts to make this inquiry, 103;
the accused should have an opportunity to prove to the world that his character has been assailed without cause, 104;
what will a committee do, 104;
it operates in the nature of an inquisition, 104;
let us first ascertain if there is sufficient grounds for an impeachment, 104;
when did this case occur, 104;
why has it rested so long, 104;
it is not of the serious nature contended, 104;
precedents do not warrant this form of proceeding, 105;
so important is this matter that the conduct of any officer should be inquired into on the demand of a member, 105;
the offence charged is such as will warrant impeachment, 105;
соответствует ли нынешнее разбирательство принципам? 105;
a charge has been made against Judge Chase, 107;
precedents examined, 107;
a more anti-republican resolution not seen, 108;
unprecedented, unparliamentary, 108;
information on the matter extremely contradictory, 109;
precedents examined, 109;
resemblance to a grand inquest, 110;
proceedings in North Carolina, 110;
difference between the friends and opponents of the resolution, 111;
form of a resolution offered, 111;
objections and personal allusions examined and answered, 112;
неужели отказ подсудимому и присяжным в праве обсуждения вопроса права ничего не значит? 113;
разве измена определена лучше убийства? 113;
должно ли предварительное расследование ограничиваться теми же правилами, которые регулируют уголовный процесс? 113;
cases of precedent offered, 113;
Палата наделена исключительным правом импичмента;
how it is to be exercised must depend on its discretion, 114;
чего требует от нас резолюция? 114;
if gentlemen are in possession of facts, let them declare them, 114;
let the instances of malfeasance of these judges be specified, 115;
какой общественный деятель будет в безопасности, если эта резолюция будет принята по запросу одного члена? 115;
observations of the opponents are incorrect; the resolution is to inquire, not to impeach, 115;
the duty of the committee will be to inquire into the official conduct of a certain public officer, 115;
if there is no ground for impeachment, the character of the officer should be vindicated, 115;
no justification in the constitution on which to ground a refusal to inquire, 115;
various objections considered, 116;
precedents for the judgment in Fries’ case, 116;
no facts have been shown, 116;
расследование является актом справедливости, причитающимся с одной стороны народу Соединенных Штатов, а с другой — должностным лицам, 117;
all the difference possible between an inquiry and an impeachment, 117;
analogy between the functions of this House and a Grand Jury correct, 117;
the reputation of the Government demands the inquiry, 117;
it is not the examination, but the result of the examination, that attaches merit or demerit to a public officer, 118;
a full inquiry into the conduct of public officers should be cherished with great care, 118;
in this case a specific charge has been made, 118;
authorities from foreign nations adduced, 118;
the case of the Western Insurrection, 119;
the precedents adduced, examined, 120;
committee of investigation of the last Congress, 120;
this resolution points to two particular officers as objects of suspicion, 121;
if charges were specified, a member, on moving the resolution, might demand an inquiry, 121;
others have their convictions as well as the mover of the resolution, 121;
common fame no ground on which to support such a resolution, 122;
on the broad basis of universal right, the resolution is condemned, 122;
reason why the charge is of a serious nature, 123;
amendment moved, 123;
moved to strike out amendment and insert other words, 124;
motion to strike out agreed to, 124;
motion to insert carried, 124;
question on agreeing to the amendment as amended, lost, 124;
original resolution carried, 124;
committee appointed, 125;
report of the committee, 161;
ordered printed for the use of the members, 161;
report, 174.
Trial of Judge Chase.—Note, 173;
report of committee in favor of impeachment adopted, 174;
committee appointed to impeach Judge Chase at the bar of the Senate, 174;
committee to prepare articles of impeachment, 174;
do. considered, 175;
managers to conduct the impeachment appointed, 175;
proceedings in the Senate, 175;
rules of proceeding adopted by the Senate, 175;
preliminary proceedings, 177, 178;
answer of Judge Chase, 178, 179, 180, 181, 182, 183, 184, 185, 186, 187, 188, 189, 190, 191;
replication by the House of Representatives, 191;
names of the witnesses, 191, 192.
Impeachment opened, 192;
ответчик подвергается импичменту за дерзкое посягательство на уголовную юриспруденцию страны путем вынесения мнения во время и в манере, ранее не слыханных и неизвестных, 192;
the soundness of the opinion is offered as a defence, 193;
this was a criminal trial for a capital offence, 193;
answer of respondent on this point examined, 193, 194;
the second article is the case of Basset, whose objection to serve on a jury was overruled by the judge, 194;
тот же отвод присяжному, который дал бы основание для нового судебного разбирательства, должен быть причиной для отстранения такого присяжного, если он заявлен до приведения его к присяге, 195;
third, the rejection of the evidence of John Taylor, 195;
разве это не неслыханная практика в уголовном преследовании — объявлять показания недопустимыми на том основании, что от них не ожидается полного оправдания заключенного? 195;
в четвертых — требование, чтобы вопросы, которые предполагается задать свидетелю, были изложены в письменном виде и предварительно представлены Суду, 196;
отказ отложить судебное разбирательство, несмотря на то, что было надлежащим образом подано аффидевит о неявке ключевых свидетелей, 196;
fifth, arresting and committing the defendant contrary to law, 196;
other articles stated, 197;
testimony of William Lewis, 198;
testimony of Alexander J. Dallas, 199;
testimony of Henry Tilghman, 201;
testimony of Wm. Rawle, 202;
testimony of George Hay, 204;
testimony of John Taylor, 207;
testimony of Philip N. Nicholas, 207;
testimony of John T. Mason, 209;
testimony of John Heath, 210;
testimony of James Triplett, 210;
testimony of John Basset, 210;
testimony of George Read, 211;
testimony of James Lea, 212;
testimony of John Montgomery, 213;
testimony of Samuel H. Smith, 214;
testimony of John Stephen, 214;
documents offered in evidence, 215.
Opening for the defence, 215;
statement of the points to which testimony will be directed, 215;
во-первых — что мнение было не только законным, но и дважды прямо выносилось и один раз допускалось в том же суде, а до этого судебного процесса было изложено в качестве общего принципа права, 215;
во-вторых, что характер обращения Бассета был совершенно неверно понят свидетелями обвинения, 216;
other points stated, 216;
в-пятых и в-шестых, что согласно правилу, торжественно установленному Верховным судом, они никогда не рассматривали законы штатов как регулирующие судопроизводство и т. д., 216;
other points stated, 216;
testimony of Samuel Ewing, 217;
testimony of Edward J. Coale, 217;
testimony of William Meredith, 217;
testimony of Luther Martin, 218;
testimony of James Winchester, 219;
testimony of William Marshall, 219;
testimony of David M. Randolph, 221;
testimony of John Marshall, 222;
testimony of Edmund J. Lee, 224;