Introduction
You leave your home country for an overseas teaching or corporate job to discover a unique financial danger. Aggressive salespeople in tax havens target you with expensive offshore investment schemes that eat your savings through hidden fees and severe surrender penalties. You stop contributing to home pensions while accumulating cash abroad without a clear plan to grow it safely.
Expatriates can build multi-million dollar fortunes by rejecting high-fee active products and investing in globally diversified low-cost index funds.
Andrew Hallam demonstrates how ordinary earners can achieve financial independence without paying high commissions to brokers or fund managers. The book explains how to harness compound interest while avoiding the emotional traps of market timing. You will learn to recognize predatory financial products and build your own maintenance-free portfolio.
- How do you select a trustworthy online brokerage from abroad?
- Which specific low-cost index funds match your home country and tax status?
- How can you stop financial advisors from siphoning your retirement wealth?
1. Index Funds and Compound Returns
Global stock market index funds provide broad diversification and reliably outperform inflation over long time horizons.
Andrew Hallam shows that you can build lasting wealth by understanding how global markets work. A global stock market index fund pools 7,400 stocks across 49 different countries. This functions like a diverse bag of seeds that always recovers from droughts.
Investment lifetimes consist of both an accumulation phase and a retirement distribution phase. You might miscalculate your time horizon by assuming it ends the day you retire. A 50-year-old planning to retire at 65 actually faces an investment duration of 35 years or longer. A 40-year-old faces a timeline of 45 years or longer.
Mechanics of Stock Returns
Profits in the stock market derive from two sources: capital appreciation driven by business earnings and dividend payouts. Public companies generate profits through business operations, paying a portion out as cash dividends.
An investor purchasing Coca-Cola stock in June 1962 who reinvested cash dividends turned $10,000 into $1.75 million by 2012. Without reinvesting dividends, that portfolio reached only $503,103. The investment earned $136,270 in cash dividends over the 50-year period.
The Power of Global Equities
Over long historical periods, global stocks have reliably outperformed inflation across multiple international markets. Between 1900 and 2016, global stocks beat inflation by an average of 5.1 percent per year, according to the Investment Returns Yearbook 2017. US stocks beat inflation by 6.4 percent annually, while South African stocks beat inflation by 7.2 percent. New Zealand stocks achieved 6.2 percent, Canadian stocks reached 5.7 percent, and Australian stocks gained 5.1 percent.
High national economic growth does not automatically translate into strong stock market returns for foreign investors. Foreigners investing in Chinese stocks between 1993 and 2013 earned less than 1 percent a year. This was a fraction of what they would have made owning US Treasury bills. $10,000 invested in Chinese stocks grew to only $13,173 by May 2017. Over the same duration, $10,000 in US stocks grew to $78,778.
Government bonds provide stability and act as a protective net against stock market volatility, despite offering lower long-term returns. Bonds involve lending money to governments or corporations in exchange for a fixed rate of interest called a coupon. Broad market government bond index funds do not experience catastrophic crashes, smoothing out portfolio fluctuations.
2. Fees and Active Management Failure
Actively managed mutual funds and high investment fees destroy a massive portion of investor returns over time.
Professional money managers represent nearly all market trading. Their average returns equal the market before fees. When high management fees are subtracted, actively managed funds severely lag behind index funds. Inflation worsens this drag over long investment horizons.
A British investor paying 2.5 percent annual fees over 55 years would see a 5,000 pound lump sum grow to just 14,858 dollars after inflation. By contrast, that same amount grows to 53,394 dollars in a British stock index fund charging 0.10 percent.
Evidence Against Active Funds
The vast majority of actively managed mutual funds fail to beat market indexes over ten-year periods. SPIVA Scorecards demonstrate that benchmark stock indexes consistently beat between 82 percent and 100 percent of actively managed funds across domestic, global, and emerging markets.
Over the ten-year period ending December 31, 2016, the European emerging-market stock market index beat 100 percent of actively managed European emerging-market stock market funds.
American expatriates face heavy tax burdens in actively managed funds because frequent internal stock trading triggers capital gains taxes. Stanford economists Joel Dickson and John Shoven showed that between 1962 and 1992, 1,000 dollars invested in 62 active funds grew to 21,890 dollars before taxes, but only 9,870 dollars after taxes in a high-income taxable account.
Nobel laureate economists and financial experts universally agree that trying to beat market indexes through active management is a delusion. Eminent scholars including William F. Sharpe, Daniel Kahneman, Merton Miller, and Warren Buffett point out that arithmetic proves investors as a group get scalped by fees. Warren Buffett created a parable in his 2006 annual report starring the Gotrocks family, who own every US stock but waste their wealth by hiring helpers like brokers and mutual fund salespeople.
Hedge funds fail to live up to their hype and underperform simple balanced index portfolios even after charging exorbitant fees. In 2008, Warren Buffett made a 1 million dollar bet against Protégé Partners that five handpicked funds of hedge funds could not beat the S&P 500 over ten years. By January 2017, Vanguard's S&P 500 Index was up 85.4 percent while the best hedge fund portfolio was up only 62.8 percent.
Selecting mutual funds based on Morningstar star ratings or past performance tracks is an ineffective strategy because top-rated funds rarely repeat their success. Tim Courtney, chief investment officer of Burns Advisory, back-tested Morningstar's highly rated funds from the decade ending in 2009 and found they subsequently underperformed their benchmark indexes and the average mutual fund.
Tactical asset allocation funds and professional market timers fail to beat diversified index portfolios because stock returns are unpredictable at short horizons. Adam Zargar, a British expat in Dubai, suffered severe losses when his financial advisor violated diversification rules by packing his portfolio with hot emerging markets like India, Thailand, and China right before those sectors stalled.
Studies by Dalbar and Morningstar reveal a persistent performance gap between what market indexes return and what average investors actually earn. Dalbar Inc. reported that between 1987 and 2016, the average US stock investor earned 3.98 percent annually, while the US stock market index gained 10.16 percent per year.
Financial advisors push expensive actively managed products and dismiss index funds because money induces self-centered behavior and guarantees higher commissions. Researchers Sendhil Mullainathan, Markus Noeth, and Antoinette Schoar sent actors posing as clients with a 500,000 dollar portfolio of index funds to financial advisors in Boston, and 85 percent of the advisors turned up their noses and claimed active funds were better.
3. Offshore Pension Traps
Offshore investment products and investment-linked assurance schemes carry exorbitant fees and severe surrender penalties.
Sales representatives often hide total costs, which include annual management charges, establishment costs, underlying mutual fund fees, and mirror fund charges. These total roughly 4 percent or more per year, effectively neutralizing profits when combined with average market gains and inflation.
Canadian expat Steve Batchelor invested in a Friends Provident Premier Advance plan in 2007, paying initial annual fees of 9.7 percent during the first 18 months and remaining locked into high ongoing costs.
Financial salespeople promote restrictive offshore pension plans primarily because they generate massive, immediate upfront commissions paid by the insurance companies. Brokers maximize the term length to maximize their commission, which is often equivalent to the entire sum of an investor's first-year deposits. A broker convincing a client to invest $1,000 per month on a 25-year policy would earn a brokerage commission of $12,600.
Commissions and Penalties
Offshore pension contracts enforce severe early redemption penalties that trap investors who try to escape high fees or access their money for emergencies. If investors attempt to surrender their policies during the initial allocation period or before the termination date, they can lose a massive percentage of their portfolio value, sometimes forfeiting 80 to 100 percent of their accumulated proceeds.
Indian national Alla Rao discovered that selling his Zurich International Vista policy after 4.5 years would cost him 33 percent of everything he had invested due to early redemption penalties.
Advisers selling offshore schemes frequently fail to build diversified portfolios, concentrating client money in high-risk, volatile niche sectors that underperform global markets. Because licensing tests for these products require minimal focus on multi-asset-class allocation, salespeople often stuff portfolios with emerging markets, gold, or regional funds based on recent past performance rather than establishing a balanced mix of global stocks and bonds.
Spaniard Miguel Delgado invested 250,000 euros of his inheritance into a Protected Asset TEP Fund that crashed by 35 percent in 2008 and failed to fully recover years later.
Transferring British government defined benefit pensions into offshore qualified recognized overseas pension schemes is rarely advantageous and often financially disastrous. Aggressive salespeople target British public sector workers, convincing them to cash in secure government pensions for high-charge, poorly regulated substitutes or unregulated collective investment schemes. An expat teacher at Abu Dhabi's Brighton College cried when telling the author she transferred £300,000 from her UK pension, only for it to drop in value to £180,000.
Evaluating Existing Policies
Even when facing massive cancellation penalties, investors trapped in expensive offshore pensions can come out significantly ahead by cutting their losses and switching to low-cost index funds.
Hong Kong resident DeAnn faced a HK$50,500 penalty to cancel her Zurich Vista policy, but calculations showed she could retire nearly a million dollars richer by moving her remaining funds into an index portfolio costing 0.2 percent annually.
Investors must conduct rigorous mathematical checks and scrutinize contract terms before deciding whether to abandon, modify, or maintain an existing offshore pension. Reviewing statements and product guides reveals hidden cost structures that bonuses fail to cover, allowing savers to make informed decisions about mitigating damage.
Colette Hirst realized her RL 360 Quantum plan's 75 percent initial boost was just an upfront allocation bonus masking heavy 9.5 percent annual charges on her first 18 months of contributions.
- Do the math with a compound interest calculator such as the one at www.moneychimp.com
- Understand all of the fees first, along with any bonus units you might be entitled to
- Contact your advisor about softening redemption costs to see if some money is eligible for a free withdrawal
- Determine whether it is worth hanging on to your policy, taking the hit and canceling, or limiting the damage by reducing or eliminating new deposits if the policy allows it
4. Investor Psychology and Market Timing
Our ancestors learned to identify life-threatening patterns like tigers or poisonous berries to survive. We apply this same pattern recognition to stocks, assuming that falling prices will keep falling and rising prices will keep rising, causing panic during market drops.
Human emotional interference and Neanderthal pattern-seeking behavior cause investors to buy high and sell low.
Statistics Canada data shows that about 71 percent of adult Canadians over age 20 are below age 60 and should prefer to see stocks sputter while they accumulate wealth. There are 28.4 million Canadians over the age of 20, and 29 percent of adult Canadians are 60 years of age or older. Anyone who is a net saver and plans to buy stocks for at least the next five years should celebrate falling markets instead of fearing them.
Behavioral Pitfalls
Human emotional interference causes average mutual fund investors to significantly underperform the actual funds they own by trying to time the market. A friend of the author sold his British stock index during the Brexit vote and missed a quick 20 percent gain. Similarly, the S&P 500 gained 11.96 percent in 2016, but the average US mutual fund investor gained just 7.26 percent.
From January 1987 to December 31, 2016, the S&P 500 achieved a 10.16 percent average compound annual return, while the average American investor managed a 3.98 percent average compound annual return over the same period. Fidelity's Emerging Market Fund reached an 8.9 percent compound annual return compared to 4.12 percent for its average investor.
Women are better investors because they trade less frequently, diversify better, and suffer less from overconfidence. Vanguard found that its female clients earned 5 percent more than male account holders between 2005 and 2010. Barber and Odean found that women beat men by nearly 3 percent per year on a risk-adjusted basis.
- 32 percent of men versus 23 percent of women put too much money in a single investment.
- Men trade 45 percent more frequently compared to women.
Market Timing Fallacy
Attempting to time the market is a fool's errand because missing just a handful of the best trading days drastically destroys long-term returns. From 1982 through December 2005, US stocks averaged 10.6 percent annually, but missing the 10 best trading days dropped the average return to 8.1 percent, and missing the 50 best days left just 1.8 percent.
Financial forecasters and media pundits possess a success rate no better than random chance when predicting stock market directions. CXO Advisory tracked 6,584 forecasts by 68 experts between 2005 and 2012 and found they were right just 46.9 percent of the time. Jim Cramer scored 46.8 percent accuracy, and animals like Orlando the cat have beaten professional stock pickers, delivering a 10.8 percent gain in a stock-picking contest versus 3.5 percent for professionals.
5. Couch Potato Portfolios
The Couch Potato portfolio combines low-cost stock and bond index funds into a simple strategy requiring minimal maintenance.
Devised by Scott Burns, the strategy requires splitting investments between stock and bond indexes and rebalancing annually. This forces investors to sell a portion of what has performed well and buy what has dropped, automatically buying low and selling high.
Scott Burns created the original Couch Potato portfolio as an even split between a stock market index and a bond market index, requiring less than an hour of maintenance per year. Basic diversified Couch Potato portfolios cost just 0.10 percent per year. Between 1986 and 2017, a $10,000 investment yielded $119,080 in a 50/50 portfolio and $162,219 in an 80/20 portfolio.
- Split monthly investment contributions evenly between a stock index and a bond index.
- Review the portfolio once a year to determine whether stocks or bonds hold a larger share.
- Sell a portion of the outperforming asset class and use the proceeds to buy the underperforming asset class to restore the original asset allocation.
Asset Allocation
Bonds provide vital portfolio stability, reduce emotional panic during market crashes, and prevent investors from selling stocks at cyclical bottoms.
Between September 2000 and September 2002, a $10,000 investment purely in the S&P 500 index plummeted to $5,518. A balanced 60/40 stock and bond portfolio dropped only to $7,779 during the same period. Between 2000 and 2011, the US Total Bond Market Index achieved a 6.08 percent annualized return, whereas the S&P 500 Index managed just 0.32 percent.
- Determine bond allocation based on personal risk tolerance, age, and alternative pension income without exceeding a personal ceiling for growth.
- Maintain a consistent bond percentage so that market crashes provide opportunities to sell safe bonds and buy discounted stock indexes.
6. Advisors and Brokerages
Scrupulous financial advisors avoid commissions and build indexed portfolios, while discount brokerages provide global access.
Choosing an Advisor
Good advisors should charge consultation fees or a low percentage of assets under management. They never receive commissions or kickbacks, avoid individual stock picking, and build portfolios exclusively using low-cost index funds from approved providers.
Teacher Mark Scharen was recommended an advisor who proposed high-cost index funds like Nationwide's S&P 500 Index Class C costing 1.24 percent annually. Low-cost alternatives like Schwab charged just 0.09 percent for the exact same stocks.
- Verify the advisor does not receive commissions or mutual fund kickbacks.
- Ensure the advisor refuses to purchase individual stocks for your portfolio.
- Confirm the annual management fee is no more than 1.25 percent.
- Avoid advisors who alter portfolios based on economic predictions.
- Insist that index funds or ETFs come only from approved low-cost providers like Vanguard, Fidelity, Schwab, DFA, T. Rowe Price, iShares, Horizon, BetaShares, or PowerShares.
Offshore Brokerages
Non-American expatriates seeking the cheapest and most profitable index portfolio management should use stable, low-cost offshore discount brokerages without trading more than once a month. The ideal discount brokerage must allow remote account management and maintain low costs.
- Ensure the discount brokerage account can be opened and managed regardless of your current residence.
- Verify that brokerage costs are low and located in a region with stable government and solid banking regulations.
- Confirm whether offshore investments are tax-free with a tax accountant before choosing a jurisdiction.
- Limit trading activity to buying ETFs no more than once a month.
7. DIY Investor Questions
Do-it-yourself investors must understand ETF mechanics, avoid tax traps, and evaluate alternative assets carefully.
Index funds and Exchange-Traded Index Funds (ETFs) perform identically if they track the same market and charge equivalent expense ratios. Index funds are bought directly from fund companies with no commission costs and automated dividend reinvestment. ETFs are purchased from stock exchanges via brokerages that charge commissions and require manual reinvestment of accumulated cash dividends.
Vanguard's S&P 500 index fund holds the exact same 500 stocks as the iShares S&P 500 ETF.
Non-American investors buying ETFs directly from US stock markets can face severe US estate taxes upon death if holdings exceed US $60,000. State Street's SPY ETF on the NYSE triggers US estate taxes, while Vanguard Canada's VFV, Vanguard UK's VUSA, and iShares Australia's IVV do not. Currency fluctuations are natural and often provide beneficial boosts when foreign currencies strengthen. Hedging mechanisms involve constant cross-currency transactions that generate expensive spreads and fees. PWL Capital research showed hedged funds underperformed by an average of 1.49 percentage points per year between 2006 and 2009.
While dollar cost averaging reduces psychological stress, academic studies prove that odds favor investing a lump sum immediately because markets rise more often than they fall.
- Know what you want to buy by locating the ticker symbol or quote on provider websites or via Google search.
- Determine how many units you want by looking up current prices on platforms like Yahoo Finance or Morningstar and converting currencies if necessary.
- Make your purchase by logging in, selecting trade or order entry, choosing the market and exchange, entering buy, specifying the share count and ETF symbol, and choosing either a market or limit order.
Alternative Assets
Ongoing annual fund costs and account fees are far more destructive to long-term investment returns than purchase commissions or exchange rate fees. Joe pays higher purchase commissions but low ongoing fund costs and finishes with $731,066.88 after 25 years, whereas Julie pays zero commissions but suffers 2.5 percent in annual fund and account costs, finishing with only $539,659.81.
- Follow the 1 percent rule for commissions to ensure you never pay more than 1 percent of your total invested proceeds in trading fees.
Muslim investors can build diversified, Shariah-compliant portfolios using specialized index funds that screen out prohibited industries and interest-bearing bonds. Over the five-year period ending March 31, 2017, the iShares World Islamic ETF averaged a compound annual return of 9.56 percent compared to 12.46 percent for the non-compliant iShares Core MSCI World Index. Cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum are speculative assets rather than true investments because they produce no cash flows, businesses, or earnings. Between July 2013 and June 2017, Bitcoin gained 3,130 percent.
Adding a small allocation of real estate investment trusts to a portfolio of stocks and bonds can enhance returns while reducing volatility. Gregg S. Fisher's research showed that adding a 10 percent allocation of global REITs to a 60/40 US stock and bond portfolio increased compounding returns from 8.72 percent to 8.83 percent per year between 1990 and 2014 while lowering volatility in about 65 percent of rolling ten-year periods.
- Add a 10 percent overall allocation to global REITs alongside stocks and bonds, rebalance once a year, and avoid chasing them after a bad run or hot streak.
Gold fails to beat inflation over the long term and falls drastically short compared to productive stock market investments. Jeremy Siegel's data calculated that one dollar invested in gold in 1801 was worth only about $52 by 2017, whereas one dollar invested in the US stock market in 1801 grew to about $17 million.
8. Portfolio Models by Nationality
Expatriates from America, Canada, Britain, Australia, and Europe can construct tailored portfolios using local exchange-traded funds.
American and Canadian Models
Vanguard operates under an investor-ownership structure that eliminates conflicts of interest and drives consistent cost reductions. The company uses revenue solely to pay business expenses and passes accumulated savings back to clients by lowering expense ratios.
Forbes reported in 2016 that the Johnson family, owners of the fund giant Fidelity, amassed a net worth of $28.5 billion from fund fees.
Vanguard Target Retirement funds help investors achieve higher returns than the funds themselves by encouraging dollar-cost averaging. Between May 31, 2007, and May 31, 2017, Vanguard's Target Retirement 2035 fund earned a compound return of 5.07 percent per year, but the average investor earned 7.16 percent per year. Interactive Brokers serves as a viable platform for US expatriates navigating foreign account compliance regulations under FATCA.
Canadian active mutual funds suffer from exceptionally high costs that cause them to consistently lag behind market indexes. Four young residents of Victoria visited four major Canadian banks and were steered toward actively managed funds charging an average of 2.2 percent per year. Canadian expats must avoid US-domiciled stocks and exchange-traded funds to protect their heirs from punitive US estate taxes.
Global and European Models
Swap-based ETFs offer Canadian investors a tax-efficient structure by replacing physical stock holdings with total-return contracts. Horizons S&P/TSX 60 index ETF tracks Canada's largest stocks for a fee of 0.03 percent. Certain British financial institutions charge high fees for index tracker funds while failing to track market indexes accurately. Between 2010 and 2016, Virgin's UK stock index underperformed Vanguard's equivalent index by an average of 1.07 percent per year.
Managing a multicurrency Couch Potato portfolio requires converting asset values into a common currency to determine exact allocation drifts.
- Convert each fund market value into a common base currency using current exchange rates.
- Add all converted fund values together to calculate the total portfolio value in the common currency.
- Multiply the total portfolio value by your target asset percentage to find the exact goal allocation amount for each asset class.
- Compare the goal allocations against actual holdings to identify which assets are overweight or underweight.
- Rebalance by selling overweight assets or directing new purchases exclusively into underweight assets until allocations align.
European expats retiring in Europe can reduce currency risk by using euro-denominated accumulating ETFs that automatically reinvest dividends.
10 Key Ideas
- Global stock market index funds provide broad diversification and reliably outperform inflation over long time horizons.
- Actively managed mutual funds and high investment fees destroy a massive portion of investor returns over time.
- Offshore investment products and investment-linked assurance schemes carry exorbitant fees and severe surrender penalties.
- Human emotional interference and Neanderthal pattern-seeking behavior cause investors to buy high and sell low.
- The Couch Potato portfolio combines low-cost stock and bond index funds into a simple strategy requiring minimal maintenance.
- Scrupulous financial advisors avoid commissions and build indexed portfolios, while discount brokerages provide global access.
- Do-it-yourself investors must understand ETF mechanics, avoid tax traps, and evaluate alternative assets carefully.
- Expatriates from America, Canada, Britain, Australia, and Europe can construct tailored portfolios using local exchange-traded funds.
- Ordinary earners can achieve financial independence by harnessing compound interest and rejecting high-fee active products.
- Retirees can sustain their wealth over decades by choosing low-cost index portfolios and avoiding the emotional traps of market timing.