128. Mr. Horner. Francis Horner (1778–1817), one of the founders of the Edinburgh Review, and one of the chief hopes of the Whigs in Parliament.
130. Note. The Friend, Section 1. Essay 7, ‘On the vulgar Errors respecting Taxes and Taxation.’
131. Note. ‘The road had done,’ etc. The Beggar’s Opera, Act II. Scene 1.
132. Walcheren. Seven thousand men died during the disastrous expedition to Walcheren.
Speeches in Parliament, etc. (concluded). The Examiner, Literary Notices, No. 8, Aug. 18, 1816.
‘Come, let us,’ etc. Swift’s Polite Conversation, Dialogue 1.
‘Relieve the killing languor,’ etc. Burke’s Reflections on the Revolution in France (Select Works, ed. Payne, II 120).
‘If the poor,’ etc. Burke, Thoughts and Details on Scarcity (1795), Works, Bohn, V. 84.
133. Like the dagger. Burke’s dagger scene occurred during a debate on the Alien Bill, Dec. 28, 1792. See Parl. Hist., XXX. 189.
134. As the vapours, etc. See p. 231.
136. ‘They toil not,’ etc. St. Matthew, vi. 28.
Like Lord Peter, in the ‘Tale of a Tub.’ See Section 4.
138. A Lay-Sermon, etc. The Examiner, Literary Notices, No. 11, Sept. 8, 1816. Cf. Hazlitt’s sketch of Coleridge in The Spirit of the Age.
‘Function,’ etc. Macbeth, Act I. Scene 3.
‘Or in Franciscan’ etc. Paradise Lost, III. 480.
‘Omne ignotum,’ etc. Tacitus, Agricola, Chap. XXX.
Cock-Lane Ghost. For ‘the story of a Ghost in Cock-Lane, which, in the year 1762, had gained very general credit in London,’ see Boswell’s Life of Johnson (ed. G. B. Hill), I. 406–8, and Lang’s Cock-Lane and Common Sense.
‘A penny for his thoughts.’ An old saying embalmed in John Heywood’s Proverbs and Swift’s Polite Conversation (Introduction).
139. ‘Secret Tattle.’ Congreve’s Love for Love.
‘Yet virgin of Proserpina from Jove,’ Paradise Lost, IX. 396.
The Friend, etc. The Friend; a literary, moral, and political weekly Paper, excluding personal and party politics and the events of the day (1809–1810), was re-issued in one volume in 1812, and with additions and alterations (rather a rifacimento than a new edition), in 1818. The articles in the Courier and the Watchman and the Conciones ad Populum were posthumously republished in Essays on his own Times (3 vols. 1850), edited by his daughter Sara.
Barmecide. Arabian Nights’ Entertainment, The Barber’s Story of his Sixth Brother.
‘He never is,’ etc. Altered from Pope’s Essay on Man, I. 96.
Marplot. Mrs. Centlivre’s (1667?–1723), Busy Body (1709).
‘Sublime piety’ of Jordano Bruno. See The Friend, Essays Introductory, Essay 16.
140. Damns a tragedy, etc. See Satyrane’s Letters (Biographia Literaria, Bohn, p. 258).
The late Mr. Howard. John Howard (1726–1790), the prison reformer.
Voltaire dull. The Friend, The First Landing-Place, Essay 1. Cf. The Round Table, Vol. I. p. 116.
‘Ample scope’ etc. Gray’s The Bard.
141. ‘That wantons,’ etc. Romeo and Juliet, Act II. Scene 6.
141. ‘Or like,’ etc. Burns’s Tam O’ Shanter.
‘Like to a man,’ etc. Hamlet, Act III. Scene 3.
142. ‘Less than arch-angel’ etc. Paradise Lost, I. 593–4.
The ——. The poet-laureate (Southey) presumably.
‘To stand himself’ etc. The Beggar’s Opera, Act I. Scene 1.
When his six Irish friends, etc. See The Round Table, Vol. i. p. 54.
143. The Statesman’s Manual, etc. The Examiner, Literary Notices, No. 21, Dec. 29, 1816.
Here is the true Simon Pure. Mrs. Centlivre’s A Bold Stroke for a Wife (1718).
‘And tis a kind of good deed,’ etc. Henry VIII., Act III. Scene 2.
144. ‘Still harping on my daughter.’ Hamlet, Act II. Scene 2.
146. The impertinent barber, etc. The Thousand and One Nights, The Story told by the Tailor.
‘And the time that Solomon reigned’ etc. See I Kings xi. 42–3, and xii. 1–20.
Note. In The Examiner this note continued: ‘Hypocrisy does not relate to the degree of success with which a man imposes on himself, but on the motives which make him attempt it. The greatest hypocrites are those who can impose most successfully on themselves, that is, conceal from their own minds their sinister motives for judging, or suppress their real, under-opinions. We think it a piece of hypocrisy for a man to insinuate, after reading this part of the Bible, that that Manual of the Statesman is favourable to the doctrine of Divine Right.’
147. ‘Imposture,’ etc. Quoted from Coleridge’s Statesman’s Manual.
148. Burs and kecksies. Henry V., Act V. Scene 2.
A Colquhoun. Patrick Colquhoun (1745–1820), London Police magistrate and social reformer, author of A Treatise on the Police of the Metropolis (1795).
‘Oh thou particular fellow.’ Henry VI., Part II. Act IV. Scene 2.
‘Secret Tattle.’ See ante, note to p. 139.
149. We well remember, etc. See Hazlitt’s Essay, ‘My First Acquaintance with Poets,’ from which it appears that it was Coleridge himself who made the remark about Thomson. The ‘solitary ale-house’ was at the Valley of Rocks near Lynton.
Mr. Southey’s ‘Tract on the Madras System.’ An article of Southey’s in the Quarterly Review for October 1811, reprinted as ‘Origin, Nature, and Object of the New System of Education.’ Hazlitt has in mind a note of Coleridge’s in the Lay Sermon (Bell’s edition, p. 328), where he says, ‘See Mr. Southey’s tract on the new or Madras system of education: especially towards the conclusion, where with exquisite humour as well as with his usual poignancy of wit he has detailed Joseph Lancaster’s disciplinarian inventions,’ etc. For an account of the Madras system of education and of the warfare between Joseph Lancaster (1770–1838) and Andrew Bell (1753–1832), and between their respective followers, see Leslie Stephen’s The English Utilitarians, II. 17 et seq.
The late African expedition. Lord Exmouth’s successful bombardment of Algiers in August 1816.
152. Mr. Coleridge’s Lay-Sermon. This letter is the germ of the well-known essay entitled ‘My First Acquaintance with Poets,’ which Hazlitt afterwards contributed to the third number of Leigh Hunt’s short-lived review The Liberal: Verse and Prose from the South. The present letter (except the two last paragraphs) was repeated in the essay which was first republished in Literary Remains (1836).
152. ‘Il y a des impressions,’ etc. A favourite quotation from Rousseau’s Confessions.
His text. St. John vi. 15.
‘Rose like a steam,’ etc. Comus, l. 556.
‘Of one crying,’ etc. St. Matthew iii. 3–4.
153. ‘Such were the notes,’ etc. Pope’s Epistle to Robert, Earl of Oxford, l. 1.
‘Like to that sanguine flower,’ etc. Lycidas, l. 106.
Like Timon. Timon of Athens, Act III. Scene 6.
Note.—‘The Correspondent; consisting of letters, moral, political, and literary, between eminent writers in France and England.’ The English articles were arranged by Dr. Stoddart.
154. Bonaparte and Müller. This fragment appeared in The Examiner on Dec. 15, 1816. Johannes von Müller (1752–1809) was introduced to Napoleon after the battle of Jena (1806). His collected works appeared in 27 vols. (1800–1817).
155. Illustrations of the Times Newspaper. The Examiner, Literary Notices, No. 19, Dec. 15, 1816.
‘Out of these convertites,’ etc. As You Like It, Act V. Scene 4.
‘All honourable men.’ Julius Caesar, Act III. Scene 2.
‘But all is conscience,’ etc. Chaucer, Prologue, 150.
156. The Recruiting Officer. Farquhar’s The Recruiting Officer, Act I. Scene 1.
Miss Lucy Lockitt. The Beggar’s Opera, Act II.
157. Here comes one of them. Wordsworth. Hazlitt perhaps refers to a conversation with Wordsworth at Alfoxden, though that must have been in 1798, not 1800.
A Sonnet to the King. The Sonnet (entitled ‘November 1813’) beginning ‘Now that all hearts are glad,’ etc.
‘Such recantation,’ etc. The Excursion, Book III.
‘Proud Glaramara,’ etc. Wordsworth, To Joanna.
Sir Robert Wilson’s gallant conduct. In assisting Lavalette to escape from Paris on Jan. 10, 1816. Wilson and two others, Captain Hutchinson and Mr. Bruce, were tried in Paris and sentenced to three months’ imprisonment.
Joan of Arc. Published in 1796. The first edition contained in Book II. some lines by Coleridge which were afterwards published, with additions, as The Destiny of Nations in Sibylline Leaves (1817). Southey refers to the poem (Preface, 1837) as ‘crudely conceived, rashly prefaced, and prematurely hurried into the world.’ The Examiner in 1816 published a selection of ‘Specimens of Early Jacobin Poetry,’ entitled ‘Acanthologia.’ One of these (Aug. 25, 1816) was the ‘Inscription for a Monument at Old Sarum,’ with a motto from the Quarterly Review, ‘A Reformer is worse than a housebreaker.’
Fire, Famine and Slaughter. First published in The Morning Post (Jan. 8, 1798) and republished in Sibylline Leaves (1817) with an apologetic preface. Gale and Fenner, publishers of the Statesman’s Manual, carried on business in Paternoster Row.
‘Whose grief,’ etc. Hamlet, Act V. Scene 1.
158. The editor of ‘The Times.’ Dr. Stoddart.
King Cambyses’ vein. Henry IV., Part I. Act II. Scene 4.
‘Horrors on horror’s head accumulating.’ Othello, Act III. Scene 3.
Mr. Koenig’s new press. The steam printing-press of Frederick Koenig was adopted by The Times in 1814, the number for Nov. 29 containing the announcement that ‘our journal of this day presents to the public the practical result of the greatest improvement connected with printing since the discovery of the art itself,’ See Fox Bourne’s English Newspapers, I. 356.
158. Dr. Slop’s curse. This name was frequently applied to Stoddart after he had become editor of The New Times. In 1820 William Hone published a burlesque on The New Times, entitled ‘A Slap at Slop.’
The roasting of Protestants. At Nismes. See ante, p. 118.
Lord Castlereagh’s Letter to Mon Prince. A letter from Castlereagh, dated Vienna, 11th October 1814, addressed to Prince Hardenberg, the representative of Prussia at the Vienna Congress, in which Castlereagh states that he can raise no objection to the incorporation of Saxony with the Prussian monarchy. The letter provoked much comment in the press during the following year and was referred to in the House of Commons (April 10, 1815).
159. Like Perillus’s bull. The bronze bull made for Phalaris by Perillus, who was himself its first victim:—
‘Thus Phalaris Perillus taught to low,
And made him season first the brazen cow.
A rightful doom, the laws of nature cry,
’Tis, the artificers of death should die.’
Dryden, Ovid’s Art of Love, I. 737–40.
‘His most sweet voice.’ Coriolanus, Act II. Scene 3.
Mr. Walter. John Walter the Second (1776–1847), son of the founder of The Times, who died in 1812.
‘Thy stone,’ etc. Pope, Ode on St. Cecilia’s Day, 66–7.
‘Once a Jacobin always a Jacobin.’ Coleridge contributed an article under this heading to The Morning Post (Essays on his own Times, II. 542), in which he stated that Pitt in one of his most powerful speeches (Feb. 17, 1800) had given the adage ‘every advantage that is derivable from stately diction.’ According to Coleridge’s own report (Essay on his own Times, II. 295) Pitt said: ‘The mind once tainted with Jacobinism can never be wholly free from the taint; I know no means of purification; when it does not break out on the surface, it still lurks in the vitals; no antidote can approach the subtlety of the venom, no length of quarantine secure us against the obstinacy of the pestilence.’ See ante, note to p. 110.
160. ‘What’s Hecuba to him or he to Hecuba.’ For this and the two succeeding quotations see Hamlet, Act II. Scene 2.
That unfortunate Miss Bailey. George Colman the Younger’s Love Laughs at Locksmiths, Act II.
‘Society became,’ etc. Wordsworth, The Excursion, Book III.
161. Proof against conviction. In The Examiner this paragraph was succeeded by the following passage:—‘What a pity he is not a poet or a man of genius! (Your dull fellows ought to be honest; for every body ought to be something.) He might then instead of wholesome truths have given us agreeable lies; for plain facts, pompous fictions; he might have strewed the flowers of poetry on the rotten carcase of corruption, and have made the ugly face of war look amiable at a distance. He might have trumped up a romantic episode about the Duchess d’Angouleme,[68] as Mr. Burke did about her wretched mother, or have seen visions on the mountain tops like Mr. Wordsworth, or have dreamt a dream more in the manner of Spenser than The Laureat’s Lay. There might then have been something like an observation, a thought, a trope, a jest, a lucky epithet, a well written sentence, in all the long, dreary, heavy columns of The Times newspaper. But as our author cannot soar, he grovels; and no one ever sunk so low. He is a perfect Grub-street. His want of eloquence renders him abusive; he has no power over words, or he would not call names at the rate he does. He throws dirt and rubbish at the heads of his adversaries, because he can get nothing else to throw. Do you think he would go on for ever with that round of slang-phrases, dreadful to the ear, and petrific even to behold; monstrous, prodigious, unutterable, without argument, without sense or decency, calculated only to stupify or disgust, with which he piles up the columns of The Times newspaper, if he had any resources either of imagination or understanding? It is the want of power equal to his will, that inflames his malice and inflates his style; he makes up for what he wants in strength, by coarseness; for what he wants in variety, by repetition; for what he wants in sallies of wit, by systematic dulness; for what he wants in reason, by brutal outrage. And then, did any mortal ever read such a style? The flowers of Billingsgate, arranged according to the rules of Lindley Murray’s English Exercises, with all the ridiculous pedantry of subjunctive moods and adverbial expletives:
“In many a winding bout
Of linked dulness long drawn-out.”[69]
It is as if the celebrated pastry-cook in Cornhill[70] should get cart-loads of mud to do up in twelfth cakes, with cuts of kings, queens, and bishops, for his Christmas customers. All that is low in understanding, vulgar and sordid in principle in city politics, is seen exuding from the formal jaws of The Times newspaper, as we see the filth, and slime, and garbage, and offal of this great city pouring into the Thames, from the sewers and conduit-pipes of the scavenger’s company. It is a patent water-closet for the dirty uses of legitimacy: a leaden cistern for obsolete prejudices and upstart sophistry “to knot and gender in.”[71] Is this an exaggerated account? No. We have not words to do justice to the subject. The Times newspaper is a phenomenon without any parallel in history: it is the triumph of the reign of George III. It is supposed to be the organ of the Stock Exchange politics; and, to be sure, there is a wonderful sympathy between them. Neither Burke nor Junius would have done so well. There is nothing in the pages of The Times that can lose in loftiness or elegance by repetition in the money-market, or draw off the attention of the bulls and bears from their ledgers, or their soups and venison. The vulgarity of the Editor’s style might even receive a romantic tincture from the Hebraism of its pronunciation, and its monotony would be agreeably relieved by the discordant gabble of that disinterested congregation of stock-jobbing Jews and Gentiles. The secret of the composition of The Times is this. The city wants a bugbear to suit their interest, and the Editor of the city paper creates a bugbear out of his malice. He nicknames this bugbear, but as he does not believe in it, he repeats his nickname ten or a dozen times every day, till by so doing he begins to believe it. They begin to believe it too; and the echo and buz of the Stock Exchange gives him courage to go on. He then tries other and more odious nicknames, which he and others believe, not because they are true, but because they are odious, and gratify the malice of the writer, and answer the readers’ ends. Thus the city and the city Editor go on hand in hand, creating a bugbear out of nothing, and swelling it into a monster, heaping all sorts of vices and deformities upon it, and believing them all, in proportion as they are incredible and contradictory—if they are disproved, repeating them the louder—making the disgust, fear and hatred, which their bugbear inspires, a proof of its existence, and determined more and more to indulge their disgust, fear and hatred, in proportion as their passions and prejudices have no other foundation than their own spite and credulity—drowning reason in passion—overcoming common sense, by shocking common decency—believing in the chimeras of their own brain, from their very hideousness, as children put faith in apparitions, in proportion to their dread of them—ringing everlastingly in each other’s ears, what they each wish to believe; and believing that there is some reason for the everlasting din and noise they make, because they make it—creating a war-bugbear, because they wanted something to go to war with, requiring the same wanton and unprincipled sacrifices of the blood and treasure of their country to be made to this phantom of their own making, as to the direst necessity; and persisting in the justice and wisdom of their measures, from the very miseries which these helpmates of the Bourbons have brought upon the world—to gratify the mercantile avarice of the Stock Exchange and the literary vanity of its tool, the Editor of The Times. The interest of the Stock Exchange, and the philosophy of the Editor of The Times, no longer, however, draw the same way and we suspect they will soon dissolve partnership. Such writers do their country best service in the end; “kept like an apple in the jaw of an ape, first mouthed, and last swallowed: it is but squeezing them, and spunge, you shall be dry again.”[72]
161. Illustrations, etc. On Modern Lawyers and Poets. The Examiner, Literary Notices, No. 20, Dec. 22, 1816.
Facilis, etc. Æneid, VI. 126 et seq.
‘Let no man,’ etc. Merchant of Venice, Act II. Scene 9.
162 Sam Sharpset. In Thomas Morton’s (1764?–1838) The Slave, acted at Covent Garden, Nov. 12, 1816.
‘The Devil,’ etc. Hamlet, Act II. Scene 2.
‘Britain’s warriors,’ etc.
‘Of Britain’s Court ... a proud assemblage there,
Her Statesmen, and her Warriors, and her Fair.’