Элиша Бенджамин Эндрюс

«История Соединенных Штатов, Том 1»

Страница 4 из 5 · 54 972 зн. · 63 мин. чтения

If not a Charlemagne or a Louis XIV., he yet possessed elements of true

greatness. While he lived his mind evidently guided, as his will

dominated and prolonged, the war. This is saying much, for the Indian's

disinclination to all strenuous or continuous exertion was pronounced

and proverbial. Philip's treatment of Mrs. Rowlandson must be declared

magnanimous, especially as, of course, he was but a savage king, who

might reasonably request us not to measure him by our rules. The other

party to the war we have a right to judge more rigidly, and just

sentence in their case must be severe. Philip's sorrowing, innocent wife

and son were brought prisoners to Plymouth, and their lot referred to

the ministers. After long deliberation and prayer it was decided that

they should be sold into slavery, and this was their fate.

CHAPTER III.

THE SALEM WITCHCRAFT

[1675]

The home life of colonial New England was unique. Its like has appeared

nowhere else in human history. Mostwise it was beautiful as well. In it

religion was central and supreme. The General Court of Plymouth very

early passed the following order: "Noe dwelling-howse shal be builte

above halfe a myle from the meeting-howse in any newe plantacion without

leave from the Court, except mylle-howses and ffermehowses." In laying

out a village the meeting-house, as the hub to which everything was to

be referred, was located first of all. The minister's lot commonly

adjoined. Then a sufficiency of land was parcelled off to each

freeholder whereon to erect his dwelling. Massachusetts from the first,

and Plymouth beginning somewhat later, also made eminent provision for

schools--all in the interest of religion.

The earliest residences were necessarily of logs, shaped and fitted more

or less rudely according to the skill of the builder or the time and

means at his disposal. There was usually one large room below, which

served as kitchen, dining-room, sitting-room, and parlor, and on the

same floor with this one or two lodging-rooms. An unfinished attic

constituted the dormitory for the rising generation. A huge stone

chimney, terminating below in a still more capacious fireplace, that

would admit logs from four to eight feet in length, conveyed away the

smoke, and with it much of the heat. This involved no loss, as wood was

a drug. Communicating with the chimney was the great stone baking-oven,

whence came the bouncing loaves of corn-bread, duly "brown," the

rich-colored "pompion" pies, and the loin of venison, beef, or pork.

Over these bounties--and such they were heartily esteemed, however

meagre--often as the family drew around the table, its head offered

thanks to the heavenly Giver. Each morning, after they had eaten, he

read a goodly portion of God's Word, never less than a chapter, and

then, not kneeling but standing, led his household in reverent and

believing prayer for protection, guidance, stimulus in good, and for

every needed grace. What purity, what love of rectitude, what strength

of will did not the builders of America carry forth from that family

altar! He who would understand the richest side and the deepest moving

forces of our national life and development must not overlook those New

England fireside scenes.

[1688-1700]

Prayers ended, the "men folks" went forth to the day's toil. It was

hard, partly from its then rough character, partly from poverty of

appliances. For the hardest jobs neighbors would join hands, fighting

nature as they had to fight the Indians, unitedly. Farming tools, if of

iron or steel, as axe, mattock, spade, and the iron nose for the digger

or the plough, the village blacksmith usually fashioned, as he did the

bake-pan, griddle, crane, and pothooks, for indoor use. Tables, chairs,

cradles, bedsteads, and those straight-backed "settles" of which a few

may yet be seen, were either home-made or gotten up by the village

carpenter. Mattresses were at first of hay, straw, leaves, or rushes.

Before 1700, however, feather beds were common, and houses and the

entire state of a New England farmer's home had become somewhat more

lordly than the above picture might indicate. The colonists made much

use of berries, wild fruits, bread and milk, game, fish, and shellfish.

The stock wandered in the forests and about the brooks, to be brought

home at night by the boys, whom the sound of the cow-bell led. In autumn

bushels upon bushels of nuts were laid by, to serve, along with dried

berries and grapes, salted fish and venison, as food for the winter.

Every phase and circumstance of this pioneer life reminded our fathers

of their dependence upon nature and the Supreme Power behind nature,

while at the same time the continual need and application of neighbor's

co-operation with neighbor brought out brotherly love in charming

strength and beauty.

But to old New England religion, as a clerical, public, and organized

affair, there is a far darker side. In the eighteenth century belief in

witchcraft was nearly universal. In 1683 one Margaret Matron was tried

in Pennsylvania on a charge of bewitching cows and geese, and placed

under bonds of one hundred pounds for good behavior. In 1705 Grace

Sherwood was ducked in Virginia for the same offence. Cases of the kind

had occurred in New York. There was no colony where the belief in

astrology, necromancy, second sight, ghosts, haunted houses and spots,

love-spells, charms, and peculiar powers attaching to rings, herbs,

etc., did not prevail. Such credulity was not peculiar to America, but

cursed Europe as well. It seemed to flourish, if anything, after the

Reformation more than before. Luther firmly believed in witchcraft. He

professed to have met the Evil One in personal conflict, and to have

vanquished him by the use of an inkstand as missile. Perhaps every land

in Europe had laws making witchcraft a capital crime. One was enacted in

England under Henry VIII., another in James I.'s first year, denouncing

death against all persons "invoking any evil spirit, or consulting,

covenanting with, entertaining, employing, feeding, or rewarding any

evil spirit, or taking up dead bodies from their graves to be used in

any witchcraft, sorcery, charm, or enchantment, or killing or otherwise

hurting any person by such infernal arts." A similar statute was

contained in the "Fundamentals" of Massachusetts, probably inspired by

the command of Scripture, "Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live." This

law, we shall see, was not a dead letter.

No wonder such a law was of more effect in New England than anywhere

else on earth. The official religion of the Puritans was not only

superstitious in general but gloomy in particular, and most gloomy in

New England. Its central tenet, here at least, seemed to be that life

ought to furnish no joy, men seeking to "merit heaven by making earth a

hell." Sunday laws were severe, and rigidly enforced from six o'clock

Saturday evening till the same hour the next. Not the least work was

allowed unless absolutely necessary, nor any semblance of amusement.

Boys bringing home the cows were cautioned to "let down the bars softly,

as it was the Lord's day." Sunday travellers were arrested and fined.

Men might be whipped for absence from church. A girl at Plymouth was

threatened exile as a street-walker for smiling in meeting. Increase

Mather traced the great Boston fire of 1711 to the sin of Sunday labor,

such as carrying parcels and baking food. In Newport, some men having

been drowned who, to say good-by to departing friends, had rowed out to

a ship just weighing anchor, Rev. John Comer prayed that others might

take warning and "do no more such great wickedness."

Sermons were often two hours long; public prayer half an hour. Worse

still was what went by the name of music--doggerel hymns full of the

most sulphurous theology, uttered congregationally as "lined off" by the

leader--nasal, dissonant, and discordant in the highest imaginable

degree. The church itself was but a barn, homely-shaped, bare, and in

winter cold as out-of-doors. At this season men wrapped their feet in

bags, and women stuffed their muffs with hot stones. Sleepers were

rudely awakened by the tithing-man's baton thwacking their heads; or, if

females, by its fox-tail end brushing their cheeks. Fast-days were

common. Prayer opened every public meeting, secular as well as

religious. The doctrine of special providences was pressed to a

ridiculous extreme. The devil was believed in no less firmly than God,

and indefinitely great power ascribed to him. The Catechism--book second

in authority only to the Bible--contained of his Satanic Majesty a cut,

which children were left, not to say taught, to suppose as correct a

likeness as that of Cromwell, which crowned the mantels of so many

homes.

Increase Mather.

In a people thus trained the miracle is not that witchcraft and

superstition did so much mischief, but so little. Had it not been for

their sturdy Saxon good sense its results must have proved infinitely

more sad. The first remarkable case of sorcery in New England occurred

at Boston, in 1688. Four children of a pious family were affected in a

peculiar manner, imitating the cries of cats and dogs, and complaining

of pains all over their bodies. These were the regulation symptoms of

witch-possession, which presumably they had often heard discussed. An

old Irish serving-woman, indentured to the family, who already bore the

name of a witch, was charged with having bewitched them, and executed,

the four ministers of Boston having first held at the house a day of

prayer and fasting.

Cotton Mather.

Young Cotton Mather, grandson of the distinguished Rev. John Cotton, a

man of vast erudition and fervent piety, was at this time colleague to

his father, Increase Mather, as pastor of the Boston North Church. His

imagination had been abnormally developed by fasts and vigils, in which

he believed himself to hold uncommonly close communication with the

Almighty. His desire to provide new arms for faith against the growing

unbelief of his time led him to take one of the "bewitched" children to

his house, that he might note and describe the ways of the devil in her

case. The results he soon after published in his "Memorable Providences

Relating to Witchcrafts and Possessions." This work admitted no doubt as

to the reality of the demoniac possessions, which indeed it affected to

demonstrate forever. All the Boston ministers signed its preface,

certifying to its "clear information" that "both a God and a devil, and

witchcraft" existed. "Nothing too vile," it alleged, "can be said of,

nothing too hard can be done to, such a horrible iniquity as witchcraft

is." The publication excited great attention, and to it in no small

measure the ensuing tragedy may be traced.

Old Tituba the Indian.

In February, 1692, three more subjects, children of Rev. Mr. Parris,

minister at Danvers, then called Salem Village, exhibited bad witchcraft

symptoms. The utmost excitement prevailed. Neighboring clergymen joined

the village in fasting and prayer. A general fast for the colony was

ordered. But the "devilism," as Cotton Mather named it, spread instead

of abating, the children having any number of imitators so soon as they

became objects of general notice and sympathy. Old Tituba, an Indian

crone, who had served in Parris's family, was the first to be denounced

as the cause. Two other aged females, one crazy, the other bed-ridden,

were also presently accused, and after a little while several ladies of

Parris's church. Whoso uttered a whisper of incredulity, general or as

to the blameworthiness of any whom Parris called guilty, was instantly

indicted with them.

On April 11th, the Deputy Governor held in the meeting-house in Salem

Village a court for a preliminary examination of the prisoners. A scene

at once ridiculous and tragic followed. When they were brought in, their

alleged victims appeared overcome at their gaze, pretending to be

bitten, pinched, scratched, choked, burned, or pricked by their

invisible agency in revenge for refusing to subscribe to a covenant with

the devil. Some were apparently stricken down by the glance of an eye

from one of the culprits, others fainted, many writhed as in a fit.

Tituba was beaten to make her confess. Others were tortured. Finally all

the accused were thrown into irons. Numbers of accused persons, assured

that it was their only chance for life, owned up to deeds of which they

must have been entirely innocent. They had met the devil in the form of

a small black man, had attended witch sacraments, where they renounced

their Christian vows, and had ridden through the air on broomsticks.

Such were the confessions of poor women who had never in their lives

done any evil except possibly to tattle.

Lieutenant-Governor Stoughton.

On June 2d, a special court was held in Salem for the definite trial.

Stoughton, Lieutenant Governor, a man of small mind and bigoted temper,

was president. The business began by the condemnation and hanging of a

helpless woman. A jury of women had found on her person a wart, which

was pronounced to be unquestionably a "devil's teat," and her neighbors

remembered that many hens had died, animals become lame, and carts upset

by her dreadful "devilism." By September 23d, twenty persons had gone to

the gallows, eight more were under sentence, and fifty-five had

"confessed" and turned informers as their only hope. The "afflicted" had

increased to fifty. Jails were crammed with persons under accusation,

and fresh charges of alliance with devils were brought forward every

day.

Fac-simile of Sheriff's Return of an Execution.

Some of the wretched victims displayed great fortitude. Goodman Procter

lost his life by nobly and persistently--vainly as well,

alas!--maintaining the innocence of his accused wife. George Burroughs,

who had formerly preached in Salem Village, was indicted. His physical

strength, which happened to be phenomenal, was adduced as lent him from

the devil. Stoughton browbeat him through his whole trial. What sealed

his condemnation, however, was his offer to the jury of a paper quoting

an author who denied the possibility of witchcraft. His fervent prayers

when on the scaffold, and especially his correct rendering of the Lord's

Prayer, shook the minds of many. They argued that no witch could have

gotten through those holy words correctly--a test upon which several had

been condemned. Cotton Mather, present at the gallows, restored the

crowd to faith by reminding them that the devil had the power to dress

up like an angel of light. Rebecca Nurse, a woman of unimpeachable

character hitherto, unable from partial deafness to understand, so as to

explain, the allegations made against her, was convicted notwithstanding

every proof in her favor.

Reaction now began. Public opinion commenced to waver. No one knew whose

turn to be hanged would come next. Emboldened by their fatal success,

accusers whispered of people in high places as leagued with the Evil

One. An Andover minister narrowly escaped death. The Beverly minister,

Hale, one of the most active in denouncing witches, was aghast when his

own wife was accused. Two sons of Governor Bradstreet were obliged to

flee for their lives, one for refusing, as a magistrate, to issue any

more warrants, the other charged with bewitching a dog. Several hurried

to New York to escape conviction. The property of such was seized by

their towns. A reign of terror prevailed.

People slowly awoke to the terrible travesty of justice which was going

on. Magistrates were seen to have overlooked the most flagrant instances

of falsehood and contradiction on the part of both accusers and accused,

using the baseless hypothesis that the devil had warped their senses.

The disgusting partiality shown in the accusations was disrelished, as

was the resort that had been had to torture. One poor old man of eighty

they crushed to death because he would plead guilty to nothing. The

authorities quite disregarded the fact that everyone of the

self-accusations had been made in order to escape punishment. These

considerations effected a revolution in the minds of most people.

Remonstrances were presented to the courts, securing reprieve for those

under sentence of death at Salem. This so irritated the despicable

Stoughton that he resigned.

The forwardness of the ministers therein turned many against the

persecution, After the first victims had fallen at Salem, Governor Phips

took their advice whether or not to proceed. Cotton Mather indited the

reply. It thankfully acknowledges "the success which the merciful God

has given to the sedulous and assiduous endeavors of our honorable

rulers to defeat the abominable witch crafts which have been committed

in the country, humbly praying that the discovery of those mysterious

and mischievous wickednesses may be perfected. It is pleasant to note,

after all, the ministers' advice to the civil rulers not to rely too

much on "the devil's authority"--on the evidence, that is, of those

possessed. The court heeded this injunction all too little, but by and

by it had weight with the public, who judged that, as the trials

appeared to be proceeding on devil's evidence alone, the farce ought to

cease. The Superior Court met in Boston, April 25, 1693, and the grand

Jury declined to find any more bills against persons accused of sorcery.

King William vetoed the Witchcraft Act, and by the middle of 1693 all

the prisoners were discharged.

CHAPTER IV.

THE MIDDLE COLONIES

[1686]

The English conquest of New Netherland from the Dutch speedily followed

the Stuarts' return to the throne. Cromwell had mooted an attack on

Dutch America, and, as noticed in Chapter I., Connecticut's charter of

1662 extended that colony to include the Dutch lands. England based her

claim to the territory on alleged priority of discovery, but the real

motives were the value of the Hudson as an avenue for trade, and the

desire to range her colonies along the Atlantic coast in one unbroken

line. The victory was not bloody, nor was it offensive to the Dutch

themselves, who in the matter of liberties could not lose. King Charles

had granted the conquered tract to his brother, the Duke of York,

subsequently James II., and it was in his honor christened with its

present name of New York.

The Duke's government was not popular, especially as it ordered the

Dutch land-patents to be renewed--for money, of course; and in 1673,

war again existing between England and Holland, the Dutch recovered

their old possession. They held it however for only fifteen months,

since at the Peace of 1674 the two belligerent nations mutually restored

all the posts which they had won.

The reader already has some idea of Sir Edmond Andros's rule in America.

New York was the first to feel this, coming under the gentleman's

governorship immediately on being the second time surrendered to

England. Such had been the political disorder in the province, that

Andros's headship, stern as it was, proved beneficial. He even, for a

time, 1683-86, reluctantly permitted an elective legislature, though

discontinuing it when the legislatures of New England were suppressed.

This taste of freedom had its effect afterward.

[1690]

When news of the Revolution of 1688 in England reached New York, Andros

was in Boston. Nicholson, Lieutenant-Governor, being a Catholic and an

absolutist, and the colony now in horror of all Catholics through fear

of French invasion from Canada, Jacob Leisler, a German adventurer,

partly anticipating, partly obeying the popular wish, assumed to

function in Nicholson's stead. All the aristocracy, English or Dutch,

and nearly all the English of the lower rank were against him. Leisler

was passionate and needlessly bitter toward Catholics, yet he meant

well. He viewed his office as only transitory, and stood ready to

surrender it so soon as the new king's will could be learned; but when

Slaughter arrived with commission as governor, Leisler's foes succeeded

in compassing his execution for treason. This unjust and cruel deed

began a long feud between the popular and the aristocratic party in the

colony.

Sloughter signing Leisler's Death Warrant.

[1700]

From this time till the American Revolution New York continued a

province of the Crown. Royal governor succeeded royal governor, some of

them better, some worse. Of the entire line Bellomont was the most

worthy official, Cornbury the least so. One of the problems which

chiefly worried all of them was how to execute the navigation acts,

which, evaded everywhere, were here unscrupulously defied. Another care

of the governors, in which they succeeded but very imperfectly, was to

establish the English Church in the colony. A third was the

disfranchisement of Catholics. This they accomplished, the legislature

concurring, and the disability continued during the entire colonial

period.

Hottest struggle of all occurred over the question of the colony's right

of self-taxation. The democracy stood for this with the utmost

firmness, and even the higher classes favored rather than opposed. The

governors, Cornbury and Lovelace, most frantically, but in vain,

expostulated, scolded, threatened, till at last it became admitted by

law in the colony that no tax whatever could, on any pretext, be levied

save by act of the people's representatives.

Dutch America, it will be remembered, had reached southward to the

Delaware River, and this lower portion passed with the rest to the Duke

of York in 1664. The territory between the Hudson and the Delaware,

under the name of New Jersey, he made over to Lord Berkeley and Sir

George Carteret, proprietaries, who favored the freest institutions,

civil and religious. The population was for long very sparse and, as it

grew, very miscellaneous. Dutch, Swedes, English, Quakers, and Puritans

from New England were represented.

Seal of the Carterets.

After the English recovery Berkeley disposed of his undivided half of

the province, subsequently set off as West Jersey, to one Bylling, a

Quaker, who in a little time assigned it to Lawrie, Lucas, Penn, and

other Quakers. West Jersey became as much a Quaker paradise as

Pennsylvania. Penn with eleven of his brethren, also bought, of

Carteret's heirs, East Jersey, but here Puritan rather than Quaker

influence prevailed.

Seal of East Jersey.

The Jersey plantations came of course under Andros, and after his fall

its proprietors did not recover their political authority. For twelve

years, while they were endeavoring to do this, partial anarchy cursed

the province, and at length in 1702 they surrendered their rights to the

Crown, the Jerseys, now made one, becoming directly subject to Queen

Anne. The province had its own legislature and, till 1741, the same

governors as New York. It also had mainly the same political

vicissitudes, and with the same result.

William Penn, the famous Quaker, received the proprietorship of

Pennsylvania in payment of a claim for sixteen thousand pounds against

the English Government. This had been left him by his father, Sir

William Penn, a distinguished naval commander in the Dutch war of

1665-67, when he had borne chief part in the conquest of Jamaica.

Wampum received by Penn in Commemoration of the Indian Treaty.

William Penn was among the most cultivated men of his time, polished by

study and travel, deeply read in law and philosophy. He had fortune, and

many friends at court, including Charles II. himself. He needed but to

conform, and great place was his. But conform he would not. True to the

inner light, braving the scoffs of all his friends, expelled from Oxford

University, beaten from his own father's door, imprisoned now nine

months in London Tower, now six in Newgate, this heroic spirit

persistently went the Quaker way. In despair of securing in England

freedom for distressed consciences he turned his thoughts toward

America, there to try his "holy experiment."

William Penn; From the copy by Francis Race in the

National Museum, Philadelphia.

The charter from Charles II. was drawn by Penn's own hand and was nobly

liberal. It ordained perfect religious toleration for all Christians,

and forbade taxation save by the provincial assembly or the English

Parliament. Under William and Mary, greatly to his grief, Penn was

forced to sanction the penal laws against Catholics; but they were most

leniently administered, which brought upon the large-minded proprietary

much trouble with the home government.

As Pennsylvania, owing to the righteous and loving procedure of Penn

toward them, suffered nothing from the red men to the west, so was it

fortunately beyond Andros's jurisdiction on the east. Once, from 1692,

for two years, the land was snatched from Penn and placed under a royal

commission. Returning to England in 1684, after a two years' sojourn in

America to get his colony started, the Quaker chief became intimate and

a favorite with James II., devotedly supporting his Declaration of

Indulgence toward Catholics as well as toward all Protestant dissenters.

He tried hard but vainly to win William and Mary to the same policy.

This attitude of his cost him dear, rendering him an object of suspicion

to the men now in power in England. Twice was he accused of treasonable

correspondence with the exiled James II., though never proved guilty.

From 1699 to 1701 he was in America again, thereafter residing in

England till his death in 1718. He had literally given all for his

colony, his efforts on its behalf having been to him, so he wrote in

1710, a cause of grief, trouble, and poverty.

The Treaty Monument, Kensington.

But the colony itself was amazingly prosperous. There were internal

feuds, mainly petty, some serious. George Keith grievously divided the

Quakers by his teachings against slavery, going to law, or service as

magistrates on the part of Quakers, thus implying that only infidels or

churchmen could be the colony's officials.

Fletcher's governorship in 1693-94, under the royal commission, evoked

continual opposition, colonial privileges remaining intact in spite of

him. The people from time to time subjected their ground-law to changes,

only to render it a fitter instrument of freedom. In everything save the

hereditary function of the proprietary, it was democratic. For many

years even the governor's council was elective. The colony grew,

immigrants crowding in from nearly every European country, and wealth

multiplied to correspond.

The Penn Mansion in Philadelphia.

We have, dating from 1698, a history of Pennsylvania by one Gabriel

Thomas, full of interesting information. Philadelphia was already a

"noble and beautiful city," containing above 2,000 houses, most of them

"stately," made of brick; three stores, and besides a town house, a

market house, and several schools. Three fairs were held there yearly,

and two weekly markets, which it required twenty fat bullocks, besides

many sheep, calves, and hogs, to supply. The city had large trade to New

York, New England, Virginia, West India, and Old England. Its exports

were horses, pipe-staves, salt meats, bread-stuffs, poultry, and

tobacco; its imports, fir, rum, sugar, molasses, silver, negroes, salt,

linen, household goods, etc. Wages were three times as high as in

England or Wales. All sorts of "very good paper" were made at

Germantown, besides linen, druggets, crapes, camlets, serges, and other

woollen cloths. All religious confessions were represented.

In 1712, such his poverty, the good proprietary was willing to sell to

the Crown, but as he insisted upon maintenance of the colonists' full

rights, no sale occurred. English bigots and revenue officials would

gladly have annulled his charter, but his integrity had gotten him

influence among English statesmen, which shielded the heritage he had

left even when he was gone.

It is particularly to be noticed that till our Independence Delaware was

most intimately related to Pennsylvania. Of Delaware the fee simple

belonged not to Penn, but to the Duke of York, who had conquered it from

the Dutch, as they from the Swedes. Penn therefore governed here, not as

proprietary but as the Duke's tenant. In 1690-92, and from 1702,

Delaware enjoyed a legislature by itself, though its governors were

appointed by Penn or his heirs during the entire colonial period.

CHAPTER V.

MARYLAND, VIRGINIA, CAROLINA

[1675]

The establishment of Charles II. as king fully restored Lord Baltimore

as proprietary in Maryland, and for a long time the colony enjoyed much

peace and prosperity. In 1660 it boasted twelve thousand inhabitants, in

1665 sixteen thousand, in 1676 twenty thousand. Plantation life was

universal, there being no town worthy the name till Baltimore, which,

laid out in 1739, grew very slowly. Tobacco was the main production, too

nearly the only one, the planters sometimes actually suffering for food,

so that the raising of cereals needed to be enforced by law. For long

the weed was also the money of the province, not disused for this even

when paper currency was introduced, being found the less fluctuating in

value of the two. Partly actual over-production and partly the

navigation acts, forcing all sales to be effected through England,

fatally lowered the price, and Maryland with Virginia tried to establish

a "trust" to regulate the output.

Charles, Second Lord Baltimore.

In its incessant and on one occasion bloody boundary disputes with

Pennsylvania and Delaware, Maryland had to give in and suffer its

northern and eastern boundaries to be shortened.

[1689]

One of the most beautiful traits of early Maryland was its perfect

toleration in religion. Practically neither Pennsylvania nor Rhode

Island surpassed it in this. Much hostility to the Quakers existed, yet

they had here exceptional privileges, and great numbers from Virginia

and the North utilized these. All sorts of dissenters indeed flocked

hither out of all European countries, including many Huguenots, and were

made welcome to all the rights and blessings of the land.

But from the accession of Charles Calvert, the third Lord Baltimore, in

1675, the colony witnessed continual agitation in favor of establishing

the English Church. False word reached the Privy Council that immorality

was rife in the colony owing to a lack of religious instruction, and

that Catholics were preferred in its offices. This movement succeeded,

in spite of its intrinsic demerit, by passing itself off as part of the

rising in favor of William and Mary in 1688-89.

[1690]

James II. had shown no favor to Maryland. If its proprietary, as a

Catholic, pleased him, its civil and religious liberty offended him

more. He was hence not popular here, and the Marylanders would readily

have proclaimed the new monarchs but for the accidental failure of the

proprietary's commands to this effect to reach them. This gave occasion

for one Coode, with a few abettors, to form, in April, 1689, an

"Association in Arms for the Defence of the Protestant Religion, and for

Asserting the Right of King William and Queen Mary to the Province of

Maryland." The exaggerated representations of these conspirators

prevailed in England. The proprietary, retaining his quit rents and

export duty, was deprived of his political prerogatives. Maryland became

a Crown province, Sir Lionel Copley being the first royal governor, and

the Church of England received establishment therein.

The new ecclesiastical rule did not oppress Protestant dissenters,

though very severe on Catholics, whom it was supposed necessary, here as

all over America, to keep under, lest they should rise in favor of James

II., or his son the Pretender.

[1660]

The third Lord Baltimore died in 1714-15. The proprietaries after this

being Protestants, were intrusted again with their old political

headship. By this time a spirit of independence and self-assertion had

grown up among the citizens, enforcing very liberal laws, and the vices

of the sixth Lord, succeeding in 1751, made his subjects more than

willing that he should, as he did, close the proprietary line.

Virginia, passionately loyal, at first gloried in the Restoration. This

proved premature. It was found that the purely selfish Charles II. cared

no more for Virginia than for Massachusetts. The Commonwealth's men were

displaced from power. Sir William Berkeley again became governor, this

time, however, by the authority of the assembly. A larger feeling of

independence from England had sprung up in the colony in consequence of

recent history at home and in the mother-land. It was developed still

further by the events now to be detailed.

[1676]

The Old Dominion contained at this time 40,000 people, 6,000 being white

servants and 2,000 negro slaves, located mainly upon the lower waters of

the Rappahannock, York, and James Rivers. Between 1650 and 1670, through

large immigration from the old country, the population had increased

from 15,000 to 40,000, some of the first families of the State in

subsequent times arriving at this juncture. About eighty ships of

commerce came each year from Great Britain, besides many from New

England. Virginia herself built no ships and owned few; but she could

muster eight thousand horse, had driven the Indians far into the

interior, possessed the capacity for boundless wealth, and had begun to

experience a decided sense of her own rights and importance. The last

fact showed itself in Bacon's Rebellion, which broke out in 1676, just

one hundred years before the Declaration of Independence. The causes of

the insurrection were not far to seek.

[1673]

The navigation acts were a sore grievance to Virginia as to the other

colonies. Under Cromwell they had not been much enforced, and the

Virginians had traded freely with all who came. Charles enforced them

with all possible rigor, confining Virginia's trade to England and

English ships manned by Englishmen. This gave England a grinding

monopoly of tobacco, Virginia's sole export, making the planters

commercially the slaves of the home government and of English traders.

Duties on the weed were high, and mercilessly collected without regard

to lowness of price. All supplies from abroad also had to be purchased

in England, at prices set by English sellers. Even if from other parts

of Europe, they must come through England, thus securing her a profit at

Virginia's expense.

This was not the worst. The colonial government had always been abused

for the ends of worthless office-holders from England. Now it was farmed

out more offensively than ever. In 1673 Charles II. donated Virginia to

two of his favorites, Lords Arlington and Culpeper, to be its

proprietaries like Penn in Pennsylvania and Baltimore in Maryland. They

were to have all the quit rents and other revenues, the nomination of

ministers for parishes, the right of appointing public officers, the

right to own and sell all public or escheated lands; in a word, they now

owned Virginia. This shabby treatment awoke the most intense rage in so

proud a people. The king relented, revoked his donation, made out and

was about to send a new charter. But it was too late; rebellion had

already broken out.

The Indians having made some attacks on the upper plantations, one

Nathaniel Bacon, a spirited young gentleman of twenty-eight, recently

from England, applied to Sir William Berkeley for a commission against

them. The governor declined to give it, fearing, in the present excited

condition of the colony, to have a body of armed men abroad. Bacon,

enraged, extorts the commission by force. The result is civil war in the

colony. The rebels are for a time completely victorious. Berkeley is

driven to Accomac, on the eastern shore of the Chesapeake, but,

succeeding in capturing a fleet sent to oppose him, he returns with this

and captures Jamestown. Beaten by Bacon in a pitched battle, he again

retires to Accomac, and the colony comes fully under the power of his

antagonist, the colonists agreeing even to fight England should it

interpose on the governor's side, when a decisive change in affairs is

brought about by the rebel leader's death.

Reverend Dr. Blair, First President of William and Mary College.

[1690]

The rebellion was now easily subdued, but it had soured and hardened old

Governor Berkeley's spirit. Twenty-three in all were executed for

participation in the movement. Charles II. remarked: "That old fool has

hanged more men in that naked country than I for the murder of my

father."

After Bacon's Rebellion the colonial annals show but a dull succession

of royal governors, with few events specially interesting. Under the

governorship of Lord Howard of Effingham, which began in 1684, great

excitement prevailed in Virginia lest King James II. should subvert the

English Church there and make Catholicism dominant, which indeed might

possibly have occurred but for James's abdication in 1688.

Under Governor Nicholson, from 1690, the capital was removed from

Jamestown to Williamsburg, and the College of William and Mary founded,

its charter dating from 1693. The Attorney-General, Seymour, opposed

this project on the ground that the money was needed for "better

purposes" than educating clergymen. Rev. Dr. Blair, agent and advocate

of the endowment, pleading: "The people have souls to be saved," Seymour

retorted: "Damn your souls, make tobacco." But Blair persisted and

succeeded, himself becoming first president of the college. The initial

commencement exercises took place in 1700.

George Monk, Duke of Albemarle.

[1710]

Governor Spotswood, who came in 1710, did much for Virginia. He built

the first iron furnaces in America, introduced wine-culture, for which

he imported skilled Germans, and greatly interested himself in the

civilization of the Indians. He was the earliest to explore the

Shenandoah Valley. It was also by his energy that the famous pirate

"Black beard" was captured and executed. Lieutenant Maynard, sent with

two ships to hunt him, attacked and boarded the pirate vessel in Pamlico

Sound, 1718. A tough fight at close quarters ensued. Blackbeard was shot

dead, his crew crying for quarter. Thirteen of the men were hung at

Williamsburg. Blackbeard's skull, made into a drinking-cup, is preserved

to this day. The great corsair's fate, Benjamin Franklin, then a

printer's devil in Boston, celebrated in verse.

Carolina was settled partly from England, France, and the Barbadoes, and

partly from New England; but mainly from Virginia, which colony

furthermore furnished most of its political ideas.

[1663]

Lord Shaftesbury.

In March, 1663, Carolina was constituted a territory, extending from 36

degrees north latitude southward to the river San Matheo, and assigned

to a company of seven distinguished proprietaries, including General

Monk, who had been created Duke of Albemarle, and John Locke's patron,

the famous Lord Ashley Cooper, subsequently Earl of Shaftesbury.

Governor Sir William Berkeley, of Virginia, was also one of the

proprietaries.

[1720]

Seal of the Proprietors of Carolina.

Locke drew up for the province a minute feudal constitution, but it was

too cumbersome to work. Rule by the proprietaries proved radically bad.

They were ignorant, callous to wrongs done by their governors, and

indifferent to everything save their own profits. Many of the settlers

too were turbulent and criminals, fugitives from the justice of other

colonies. The difficulty was aggravated by Indian and Spanish wars, by

negro slavery, so profitable for rice culture, especially in South

Carolina, by strife between dissenters and churchmen, by the question of

revenue, and by that of representation.

John Locke.

[1730-1752]

A proprietary party and a larger popular party were continually at feud,

not seldom with arms, support of the Church allying itself mainly with

the former, dissent with the latter, Zealots for the Church wished to

exclude dissenters from the assembly. Their opponents would keep

Huguenot immigrants, whom the favor of the proprietaries rendered

unwelcome, entirely from the franchise. The popular party passed laws

for electing representatives in every county instead of at Charleston

alone, and for revenue tariffs to pay the debt entailed by war. The

proprietaries vetoed both. They even favored the pirates who harried the

coast. Civil commotions were frequent and growth slow. Interference by

the Crown was therefore most happy. From the time the Carolinas passed

into royal hands, 1729, remarkable prosperity attended them both.

Assuming charge of Carolina, the Crown reserved to itself the Spanish

frontier, and here, in 1732, it settled Oglethorpe, the able and

unselfish founder of Georgia, under the auspices of an organization in

form much like a mercantile company, but benevolent in aim, whose main

purpose was to open a home for the thousands of Englishmen who were in

prison for debt. Many Scotch and many Austrians also came. Full civil

liberty was promised to all, religious liberty to all but papists.

Political strife was warm here, too, particularly respecting the

admission of rum and slaves. Government by the corporators, though

well-meaning, was ill-informed and a failure, and would have been

ruinous to the colony but for Oglethorpe's genius and exertions. To the

advantage of all, therefore, on the lapse of the charter in 1752,

Georgia, like the Carolinas, assumed the status of a royal colony.

Savannah, from a Print of 1741.

James Oglethorpe.

CHAPTER VI.

GOVERNMENTAL INSTITUTIONS IN THE COLONIES

[1750]

The political life, habits, and forms familiar to our fathers were such

as their peculiar surroundings and experience had developed out of

English originals. This process and its results form an interesting

study.

The political unit at the South was the parish; in the North it was the

town. Jury trial prevailed in all the colonies. Local self-government

was vigorous everywhere, yet the most so in the North. The town

regulated its affairs, such as the schools, police, roads, the public

lands, the poor, and in Massachusetts and Connecticut also religion, at

first by pure mass meetings where each citizen represented himself and

which were both legislative and judicial in function, then by combining

these meetings in various ways with the agency of selectmen. Where and

so soon as a colony came to embrace several towns, representative

machinery was set in motion and a colonial legislature formed, having

two chambers nearly everywhere, like Parliament. The county, with the

same character as at present, was instituted later than the oldest towns

and parishes, but itself subsequently became, in thinly settled parts,

the unit of governmental organization and political action, being

divided into towns or parishes only gradually. Voting was subject to a

property qualification, in some colonies to a religious one also; but no

nobility of blood or title got foothold.

The relation of the colonial governments to England is a far more

perplexing matter. From the preceding chapters it appears that we may

distinguish the colonies, if we come down to about 1750, as either (1)

self-governing or charter colonies, in which liberty was most complete

and subjection to England little more than nominal; and (2)

non-self-governing, ruled, theoretically at any rate, in considerable

measure from outside themselves. Rhode Island and Connecticut made up

the former class. Of the latter there were two groups, the royal or

provincial, including New Hampshire, Massachusetts; New York, New

Jersey, Virginia, the Carolinas, and Georgia, and the proprietary, viz.,

Pennsylvania, Maryland, and Delaware.

Yet we are to bear in mind that many important constitutional and

governmental changes had occurred by 1750. Massachusetts, as we have

seen, had ceased to be self-governing as at first, yet it retained a

charter which conferred large liberty. All the provincial colonies began

as proprietary, and all the proprietary were for a time provincial.

Under Andros, New England stretched from the St. Croix to Delaware Bay.

After 1689 the tendency in all parts of the country was strong toward

civil freedom, which, favored by the changes and apathy of proprietaries

and the ignorance and quarrels of the English ministry, gradually

rendered the other colonies in effect about as well off in this respect

as Rhode Island and Connecticut.

But unfortunately the legal limits and meaning of this freedom were

never determined. Had they been, our Revolution need not have come.

Monarchs continually attempted to stretch hither the royal prerogative,

but how far this was legal was not then, and never can be, decided. The

constitutional scope of a monarch's prerogative in England itself was

one of the great questions of the seventeenth century, and remained

serious and unsettled through the eighteenth. Applied to America the

problem became angrier still, partly because giving a charter--and the

colonies were all founded on such gift--was an act of prerogative.

English lawyers never doubted that acts of Parliament were valid in the

colonies. The colonists opposed both the king's and the Parliament's

pretensions, and held their own legislatures to be coordinate with the

Houses at Westminster. They claimed as rights the protection of habeas

corpus, freedom from taxation without their consent, and all the Great

Charter's guarantees. It was the habit of English theorizing on the

subject to allow them these, if at all, as of grace. Repudiating the

pretence that they were represented in Parliament, they likewise denied

all wish to be so, but desired to have colonial legislatures recognized

as concurrent with the English--each colony joined to the mother-country

by a sort of personal union, or through some such tie as exists between

England and her colonies to-day. Massachusetts theorists used as a valid

analogy the relation of ancient Normandy to the French kings. Though no

longer venturing to do so at home, monarchs freely vetoed legislation in

all the colonies except Rhode Island and Connecticut. It was held that

even these colonies were after all somehow subject to England's

oversight.

On the subject of taxation there was continual dispute,

misunderstanding, recrimination. The colonies did not object to

providing for their own defence. They were willing to do this under

English direction if asked, not commanded. Direct taxation for England's

behoof was never once consented to by America, and till late never

thought of by England. The English navigation laws, however, though

amounting to taxation of America in aid of England, and continually

evaded as unjust, were allowed by the colonies' legislative acts, and

never seriously objected to in any formal way.

CHAPTER VII.

SOCIAL CULTURE IN COLONIAL TIMES

[1750]

American society rose out of mere untitled humanity; monarchy, guilds,

priests, and all aristocracy of a feudal nature having been left behind

in Europe. The year 1700 found in all the American colonies together

some 300,000 people. They were distributed about as follows: New England

had 115,000; New York, 30,000; New Jersey, 15,000; Pennsylvania and

Delaware, 20,000; Maryland, 35,000; Virginia, 70,000; the Carolina

country, 15,000. Perhaps 50,000 were negro slaves, of whom, say, 10,000

were held north of Mason and Dixon's line. What is now New York City

had, in 1697, 4,302 inhabitants.

Passing on to 1754, we find the white population of New England

increased to 425,000; that of the middle colonies, including Maryland,

to 457,000; that of Virginia, the Carolinas, and Georgia, to 283,000.

Massachusetts alone now had 207,000; Rhode Island, 35,000; Connecticut,

133,000; New York State (1756), 83,744. There were now not far from

263,000 negroes, of whom 14,000 lived in New England, 4,500 in Rhode

Island. The total population of the thirteen colonies amounted to nearly

a million and a half. At this time Philadelphia about equalled Boston in

size, each having 25,000 inhabitants. At the Revolution Boston had grown

to be the larger. New York, with from 15,000 to 18,000, constituted the

centre of trade and of politics. The city and county of New York

together numbered 13,046 inhabitants in 1756; 21,862 in 1771; 23,614 in

1786. The whole State, in 1771 had 146,144. Connecticut, in 1774, had

197,856. There are said to have been, so late as 1763, woods where the

New York City Hall now stands.

From North to South the population decreased in density, but it

increased in heterogeneity and non-English elements, and in illiteracy.

The South had also the stronger aristocratic feeling. Slaves, as the

above figures show, were far more numerous in that section. Their

condition was also worse there.

A large proportion of the white population everywhere was of

Saxon-Teutonic blood. The colonial leaders, and many others, at least in

the North, were men who would have been eminent in England itself. Not a

few New England theologians and lawyers were peers to the ablest of

their time. Numbers of the common people read, reflected, debated. While

profoundly religious, the colonists, being nearly all Protestants, were

bold and progressive thinkers in every line, prizing discussion,

preferring to settle questions by rational methods rather than through

authority and tradition. We have observed that there are exceptions to

this rule, like the treatment of Roger Williams, but they were

exceptions. The colonists possessed in eminent degree energy,

determination, power of patient endurance and sacrifice. Their political

genius, too, was striking in itself, and it becomes surprising if one

compares Germany, in the unspeakable distraction of the Thirty Years'

War, with America at the same period, 1618-1648, successfully solving by

patience and debate the very problems which were Germany's despair.

Costume about the Middle of the Seventeenth Century.

Costume about the Middle of the Seventeenth Century.

In all the southern colonies the English Church was established, a

majority of the people its members, its clergy supported by tithes and

glebe. William and Mary secured it a sort of establishment also in New

York and Maryland. Yet at no moment of the colonial period was there a

bishop in America. No church building was consecrated with episcopal

rites, no resident of America taken into orders without going to London.

[footnote: See, for these facts, The Century for May, 1888.] Even in

Virginia, till a very late colonial period, the clergy retained many

Puritan forms. Some would not read the Common Prayer. For more than a

hundred years the surplice was apparently unknown there, sacraments

administered without the proper ornaments and vessels, parts of the

liturgy omitted, marriages, baptisms, churchings, and funerals

solemnized in private houses. In some parishes, so late as 1724, the

communion was partaken sitting. Excellent as were many of the clergymen,

there were some who never preached, and not a few even bore an ill name.

It was worst in Maryland, and "bad as a Maryland parson" became a

proverb. The yearly salary in the best Virginia parishes was tobacco of

about 100 pounds value.

The Carolina clergy at first formed a superior class, as nearly all the

early ministers were men carefully selected and sent out from England by

the Society for the Propagation of the Gospel. Here there was special

interest in the religious welfare of the slaves. All Over the South the

Church ministers owed much to competition with those of sects,

especially those of the Presbyterians, to which body belonged many of

the Scotch and Irish immigrants after 1700. Dissent was dominant

everywhere at the North. A vast majority of the people even in New York

were dissenters, though the Episcopal clergy there successfully resisted

all efforts against the Church tax, notwithstanding the fact that the

same injustice in Massachusetts and Connecticut oppressed their brethren

in those colonies. The New York clergy also fought every sort of liberal

law, as to enable dissenting bodies of Christians to hold property. It

was in good degree this attitude of theirs that filled the country,

Virginia too, with such hatred of bishops.

But this spirit was fully matched by that of the Independent ministers

in New England. Their dissent was aggressive, persecuting, puritanical.

Meeting-houses were cold, sermons long and dry, music vocal only.

Religious teaching and the laws it procured, foolishly assumed to

regulate all the acts of life. Extravagance was denounced and fined. In

1750, the Massachusetts Assembly forbade theatres as "likely to

encourage immorality and impiety." Rhode Island took similar action in

1762.

Costume about the Middle of the Seventeenth Century.

The ministers of Boston viewed bishops almost as emissaries of the

devil. Herein in fact lay the primary, some have thought the deepest and

most potent cause of the Revolution, since kings and the bishops of

London incessantly sought to establish Anglicanism in Massachusetts, and

English politicians deemed it outrageous that conformists should be

denied any of that colony's privileges. For some time, under William and

Mary's charter, in this province where Congregationalism had till now

had everything its own way, only Church clergymen could celebrate

marriage. In New York and Maryland, too, hostility to the establishment

greatly stimulated disloyalty. This was true even in Anglican Virginia,

where the Church found it no easier to keep power than it was in

Massachusetts to get power, and where the clergy were unpopular,

concerned more for tithes than for souls.

Costume about the Middle of the Seventeenth Century.

Colleges were founded early in several colonies. Harvard dates from

1638; William and Mary, in Virginia, from 1693; Yale, from 1701; the

College of New Jersey, from 1746, its old Nassau Hall, built in 1756 and

named in honor of William III. of the House of Nassau, being then the

largest structure in British America. The University of Pennsylvania

dates from 1753; King's College, now Columbia, from 1754; Rhode Island

College, now Brown University, from 1764. Educational facilities in

general varied greatly with sections, being miserable in the southern

colonies, fair in the central, excellent in the northern. In Virginia,

during the period now under our survey, schools were almost unknown. In

Maryland, from 1728, a free school was established by law in each

county. These were the only such schools in the South before 1770.

Philadelphia and New York had good schools by 1700; rural Pennsylvania

none of any sort till 1750, then only the poorest. A few New York and

New Jersey towns of New England origin had free schools before the

Revolution. Many Southern planters sent their sons to school in England.

In popular education New England led not only the continent but the

world, there being a school-house, often several, in each town. Every

native adult in Massachusetts and Connecticut was able to read and

write. In this matter Rhode Island was far behind its next neighbors.

Newspapers were distributed much as schools were. The first

printing-press was set up at Cambridge in 1639. The first newspaper,

Publick Occurrences Foreign and Domestic, was started in Boston in

Обложка выбранной аудиокниги Выберите главу Плеер готов к воспроизведению
0:00 0:00

Громкость