УКАЗАТЕЛЬ ПРОИЗВЕДЕНИЙ ИММАНУИЛА КАНТА В ПРОЕКТЕ ГУТЕНБЕРГ

Составитель: Дэвид Уидджер

CONTENTS

Нажмите на ## перед каждым из названий, чтобы просмотреть оглавление соответствующего тома с гиперссылками.

Нажмите на само название, чтобы открыть исходный файл в Интернете.

##  THE CRITIQUE OF PURE REASON

##  THE CRITIQUE OF PRACTICAL REASON

##  FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS

##  THE METAPHYSICAL ELEMENTS OF ETHICS

##  THE INJUSTICE OF COUNTERFEITING BOOKS

##  CRITIQUE OF JUDGEMENT

##  PERPETUAL PEACE

##  PROLEGOMENA

ОГЛАВЛЕНИЯ ТОМОВ

КРИТИКА ЧИСТОГО РАЗУМА

Иммануил Кант

Перевод: Дж. М. Д. Мейклджон

CONTENTS

Preface to the First Edition (1781)

Preface to the Second Edition (1787)

Introduction

I. Of the difference between Pure and Empirical Knowledge

II. The Human Intellect, even in an Unphilosophical State, is in Possession of Certain Cognitions "a priori".

III. Philosophy stands in need of a Science which shall Determine the Possibility, Principles, and Extent of Human Knowledge "a priori"

IV. Of the Difference Between Analytical and Synthetical Judgements.

V. In all Theoretical Sciences of Reason, Synthetical Judgements "a priori" are contained as Principles.

VI. The Universal Problem of Pure Reason.

VII. Idea and Division of a Particular Science, under the Name of a Critique of Pure Reason.

I. Transcendental Doctrine of Elements

First Part—TRANSCENDENTAL AESTHETIC

§ 1. Introductory

SECTION I. OF SPACE

§ 2. Metaphysical Exposition of this Conception.

§ 3. Transcendental Exposition of the Conception of Space.

§ 4. Conclusions from the foregoing Conceptions.

SECTION II. OF TIME

§ 5. Metaphysical Exposition of this Conception.

§ 6. Transcendental Exposition of the Conception of Time.

§ 7. Conclusions from the above Conceptions.

§ 8. Elucidation.

§ 9. General Remarks on Transcendental Aesthetic.

§ 10. Conclusion of the Transcendental Aesthetic.

Second Part—TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC

Introduction. Idea of a Transcendental Logic

I. Of Logic in General

II. Of Transcendental Logic

III. Of the Division of General Logic into Analytic and Dialectic

IV. Of the Division of Transcendental Logic into Transcendental Analytic and Dialectic

FIRST DIVISION—TRANSCENDENTAL ANALYTIC

BOOK I. Analytic of Conceptions. § 2

Chapter I. Of the Transcendental Clue to the Discovery of all Pure Conceptions of the Understanding

Introductory § 3

Section I. Of the Logical Use of the Understanding in General. § 4

Section II. Of the Logical Function of the Understanding in Judgements. § 5

Section III. Of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding, or Categories. § 6

Chapter II. Of the Deduction of the Pure Conception of the Understanding

Section I. Of the Principles of a Transcendental Deduction in general § 9

Transition to the Transcendental Deduction of the Categories. § 10

Section II Transcendental Deduction of the pure Conceptions of the Understanding.

Of the Possibility of a Conjunction of the manifold representations given by Sense. § 11.

Of the Originally Synthetical Unity of Apperception. § 12

The Principle of the Synthetical Unity of Apperception is the highest Principle of all exercise of the Understanding. § 13

What Objective Unity of Self-consciousness is. § 14

The Logical Form of all Judgements consists in the Objective Unity of Apperception of the Conceptions contained therein. § 15

All Sensuous Intuitions are subject to the Categories, as Conditions under which alone the manifold Content of them can be united in one Consciousness. § 16

Observation. § 17

In Cognition, its Application to Objects of Experience is the only legitimate use of the Category. § 18

Of the Application of the Categories to Objects of the Senses in general. § 20

Transcendental Deduction of the universally possible employment in experience of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding. § 22

Result of this Deduction of the Conceptions of the Understanding. § 23

BOOK II. Analytic of Principles

INTRODUCTION. Of the Transcendental Faculty of judgement in General.

TRANSCENDENTAL DOCTRINE OF THE FACULTY OF JUDGEMENT OR, ANALYTIC OF PRINCIPLES.

Chapter I. Of the Schematism at of the Pure Conceptions of the Understanding.

Chapter II. System of all Principles of the Pure Understanding.

Section I. Of the Supreme Principle of all Analytical Judgements.

Section II. Of the Supreme Principle of all Synthetical Judgements.

Section III. Systematic Representation of all Synthetical Principles of the Pure Understanding.

Chapter III Of the Ground of the Division of all Objects into Phenomena and Noumena.

APPENDIX.

SECOND DIVISION—TRANSCENDENTAL LOGIC

TRANSCENDENTAL DIALECTIC. INTRODUCTION.

I. Of Transcendental Illusory Appearance.

II. Of Pure Reason as the Seat of Transcendental Illusory Appearance.

TRANSCENDENTAL DIALECTIC—BOOK I—OF THE CONCEPTIONS OF PURE REASON.

Section I-Of Ideas in General.

Section II. Of Transcendental Ideas.

Section III. System of Transcendental Ideas.

TRANSCENDENTAL DIALECTIC—BOOK II—OF THE DIALECTICAL PROCEDURE OF PURE REASON.

Chapter I. Of the Paralogisms of Pure Reason.

Chapter II. The Antinomy of Pure Reason.

Section I. System of Cosmological Ideas.

Section II. Antithetic of Pure Reason.

Section III. Of the Interest of Reason in these Self-contradictions.

Section IV. Of the necessity imposed upon Pure Reason of presenting a Solution of its Transcendental Problems.

Section V. Sceptical Exposition of the Cosmological Problems presented in the four Transcendental Ideas.

Section VI. Transcendental Idealism as the Key to theSolution of Pure Cosmological Dialectic.

Section VII. Critical Solution of the Cosmological Problem.

Section VIII. Regulative Principle of Pure Reason in relation to the Cosmological Ideas.

Section IX. Of the Empirical Use of the Regulative Principle of Reason with regard to the Cosmological Ideas.

I. Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the Composition of Phenomena in the Universe.

II. Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the Division of a Whole given in Intuition.

III. Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the Deduction of Cosmical Events from their Causes.

IV. Solution of the Cosmological Idea of the Totality of the Dependence of Phenomenal Existences.

Chapter III. The Ideal of Pure Reason.

Section I. Of the Ideal in General.

Section II. Of the Transcendental Ideal (Prototypon Trancendentale).

Section III. Of the Arguments employed by Speculative Reason in Proof of the Existence of a Supreme Being.

Section IV. Of the Impossibility of an Ontological Proof of the Existence of God.

Section V. Of the Impossibility of a Cosmological Proof of the Existence of God.

Section VI. Of the Impossibility of a Physico-Theological Proof.

Section VII. Critique of all Theology based upon Speculative Principles of Reason.

Appendix. Of the Regulative Employment of the Ideas of Pure Reason.

II. Transcendental Doctrine of Method

Chapter I. The Discipline of Pure Reason.

Section I. The Discipline of Pure Reason in the Sphere of Dogmatism.

Section II. The Discipline of Pure Reason in Polemics.

Section III. The Discipline of Pure Reason in Hypothesis.

Section IV. The Discipline of Pure Reason in Relation to Proofs.

Chapter II. The Canon of Pure Reason.

Section I. Of the Ultimate End of the Pure Use of Reason.

Section II. Of the Ideal of the Summum Bonum as a Determining Ground of the Ultimate End of Pure Reason.

Section III. Of Opinion, Knowledge, and Belief.

Chapter III. The Architectonic of Pure Reason.

Chapter IV. The History of Pure Reason.

КРИТИКА ПРАКТИЧЕСКОГО РАЗУМА

Иммануил Кант

1788

Перевод: Томас Кингсмилл Эбботт

CONTENTS

PREFACE.

INTRODUCTION.

Of the Idea of a Critique of Practical Reason.

FIRST PART — ELEMENTS OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON.

BOOK I. The Analytic of Pure Practical Reason.

CHAPTER I. Of the Principles of Pure Practical Reason.

I. DEFINITION.

REMARK.

II. THEOREM I.

III. THEOREM II.

REMARK I.

REMARK II.

IV. THEOREM II.

REMARK.

V. PROBLEM I.

REMARK.

VII. FUNDAMENTAL LAW OF THE PURE PRACTICAL REASON.

REMARK.

COROLLARY.

REMARK.

VIII. THEOREM IV.

REMARK.

REMARK II.

Practical Material Principles of Determination taken as the Foundation of Morality, are:

I. Of the Deduction of the Fundamental Principles of Pure

II. Of the Right that Pure Reason in its Practical use has to an Extension which is not possible to it in its Speculative Use.

CHAPTER II. Of the Concept of an Object of Pure Practical Reason.

Table of the Categories of Freedom relatively to the Notions of Good

Of the Typic of the Pure Practical Judgement.

CHAPTER III. Of the Motives of Pure Practical Reason.

Critical Examination of the Analytic of Pure Practical Reason.

BOOK II. Dialectic of Pure Practical Reason.

CHAPTER I. Of a Dialectic of Pure Practical Reason Generally.

CHAPTER II. Of the Dialectic of Pure Reason in defining the Conception of the "Summum Bonum".

I. The Antinomy of Practical Reason.

II. Critical Solution of the Antinomy of Practical Reason.

III. Of the Primacy of Pure Practical Reason in its Union with the Speculative Reason.

IV. The Immortality of the Soul as a Postulate of Pure Practical Reason.

V. The Existence of God as a Postulate of Pure Practical Reason.

VI. Of the Postulates of Pure Practical Reason Generally.

VII. How is it possible to conceive an Extension of Pure Reason in a Practical point of view, without its Knowledge as Speculative being enlarged at the same time?

VIII. Of Belief from a Requirement of Pure Reason.

IX. Of the Wise Adaptation of Man's Cognitive Faculties to his Practical Destination.

SECOND PART. -- METHODOLOGY OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON.

Methodology of Pure Practical Reason.

CONCLUSION.

ОСНОВЫ МЕТАФИЗИКИ НРАВСТВЕННОСТИ

Иммануил Кант

1785

Перевод: Томас Кингсмилл Эбботт

CONTENTS

PREFACE

FIRST SECTION—TRANSITION FROM THE COMMON RATIONAL KNOWLEDGE OF MORALITY TO THE PHILOSOPHICAL

SECOND SECTION—TRANSITION FROM POPULAR MORAL PHILOSOPHY TO THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS

The Autonomy of the Will as the Supreme Principle of Morality

Heteronomy of the Will as the Source of all spurious Principles of Morality

Classification of all Principles of Morality which can be founded on the Conception of Heteronomy

THIRD SECTION—TRANSITION FROM THE METAPHYSIC OF MORALS TO THE CRITIQUE OF PURE PRACTICAL REASON

The Concept of Freedom is the Key that explains the Autonomy of the Will

Freedom must be presupposed as a Property of the Will of all Rational Beings

Of the Interest attaching to the Ideas of Morality

How is a Categorical Imperative Possible?

Of the Extreme Limits of all Practical Philosophy.

CONCLUDING REMARK

МЕТАФИЗИКА НРАВОВ

Иммануил Кант

1780

Перевод: Томас Кингсмилл Эбботт

CONTENTS

PREFACE

INTRODUCTION TO THE METAPHYSICAL ELEMENTS OF ETHICS

I. Exposition of the Conception of Ethics

II. Exposition of the Notion of an End which is also a Duty

REMARK

III. Of the Reason for conceiving an End which is also a Duty

IV. What are the Ends which are also Duties?

V. Explanation of these two Notions

A. OUR OWN PERFECTION

B. HAPPINESS OF OTHERS

VI. Ethics does not supply Laws for Actions (which is done by Jurisprudence), but only for the Maxims of Action

VII. Ethical Duties are of indeterminate, Juridical Duties of strict, Obligation

VIII. Exposition of the Duties of Virtue as Intermediate Duties

(1) OUR OWN PERFECTION as an end which is also a duty

(2) HAPPINESS OF OTHERS as an end which is also a duty

IX. What is a Duty of Virtue?

X. The Supreme Principle of Jurisprudence was Analytical; that of Ethics is Synthetical

XI. According to the preceding Principles, the Scheme of Duties of Virtue may be thus exhibited

XII. Preliminary Notions of the Susceptibility of the Mind for Notions of Duty generally

A. THE MORAL FEELING

B. OF CONSCIENCE

C. OF LOVE TO MEN

XIII. General Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals in the treatment of Pure Ethics

XIV. Of Virtue in General

XV. Of the Principle on which Ethics is separated from Jurisprudence

REMARKS

Of the Doctrine of Virtue on the Principle Of Internal Freedom.

XVI. Virtue requires, first of all, Command over Oneself

XVII. Virtue necessarily presupposes Apathy (considered as Strength)

REMARK

ON CONSCIENCE

О НЕСПРАВЕДЛИВОСТИ ПЕРЕПЕЧАТКИ КНИГ

Иммануил Кант

CONTENTS

OF THE INJUSTICE OF COUNTERFEITING BOOKS

I. Deduction of the Editor's Right against the Counterfeiter

Proof of the Major

Proof of the Minor

II. Refutation of the Counterfeiter's pretended Right against the Editor.

Proof of the Major

Proof of the Minor

Universal Observation

КРИТИКА СПОСОБНОСТИ СУЖДЕНИЯ КАНТА

Перевод, введение и примечания: Дж. Г. Бернард, доктор богословия, доктор гражданского права, епископ Оссори

CONTENTS

Editor's Introduction | xi
Preface | 1
Introduction | 7
I. | Of the division of Philosophy | 7
II. | Of the realm of Philosophy in general | 11
III. | Of the Critique of Judgement as a means of combining the two parts of Philosophy into a whole | 14
IV. | Of Judgement as a faculty legislating a priori | 17
V. | The principle of the formal purposiveness of nature is a transcendental principle of Judgement | 20
VI. | Of the combination of the feeling of pleasure with the concept of the purposiveness of nature | 27
VII. | Of the aesthetical representation of the purposiveness of nature | 30
VIII. | Of the logical representation of the purposiveness of nature | 35
IX. | Of the connexion of the legislation of Understanding with that of Reason by means of the Judgement | 39
First Part.—Critique of the Aesthetical Judgement | 43
First Division.—Analytic of the Aesthetical Judgement | 45
First Book.—Analytic of the Beautiful | 45
First Moment of the judgement of taste, according to quality | 45
§ ?1. | The judgement of taste is aesthetical | 45
§ ?2. | The satisfaction which determines the judgement of taste is disinterested | 46
§ ?3. | The satisfaction in the pleasant is bound up with interest | 48
§ ?4. | The satisfaction in the good is bound up with interest | 50
§ ?5. | Comparison of the three specifically different kinds of satisfaction | 53
Second Moment of the judgement of taste, viz. according to quantity | 55
§ ?6. | The Beautiful is that which apart from concepts is represented as the object of a universal satisfaction | 55
§ ?7. | Comparison of the Beautiful with the Pleasant and the Good by means of the above characteristic | 57
§ ?8. | The universality of the satisfaction is represented in a judgement of Taste only as subjective | 59
§ ?9. | Investigation of the question whether in a judgement of taste the feeling of pleasure precedes or follows the judging of the object | 63
Third Moment of judgements of taste according to the relation of the purposes which are brought into consideration therein | 67
§ 10. | Of purposiveness in general | 67
§ 11. | The judgement of taste has nothing at its basis but the form of the purposiveness of an object (or of its mode of representation) | 69
§ 12. | The judgement of taste rests on a priori grounds | 70
§ 13. | The pure judgement of taste is independent of charm and emotion | 72
§ 14. | Elucidation by means of examples | 73
§ 15. | The judgement of taste is quite independent of the concept of perfection | 77
§ 16. | The judgement of taste, by which an object is declared to be beautiful under the condition of a definite concept, is not pure | 81
§ 17. | Of the Ideal of Beauty | 84
Fourth Moment of the judgement of taste, according to the modality of the satisfaction in the object | 91
§ 18. | What the modality in a judgement of taste is | 91
§ 19. | The subjective necessity which we ascribe to the judgement of taste is conditioned | 92
§ 20. | The condition of necessity which a judgement of taste asserts is the Idea of a common sense | 92
§ 21. | Have we ground for presupposing a common sense? | 93
§ 22. | The necessity of the universal agreement that is thought in a judgement of taste is a subjective necessity, which is represented as objective under the presupposition of a common sense | 94
General remark on the first section of the Analytic | 96
Second Book.—Analytic of the Sublime | 101
§ 23. | Transition from the faculty which judges of the Beautiful to that which judges of the Sublime | 101
§ 24. | Of the divisions of an investigation into the feeling of the Sublime | 105
A.—Of the Mathematically Sublime | 106
§ 25. | Explanation of the term "Sublime" | 106
§ 26. | Of that estimation of the magnitude of natural things which is requisite for the Idea of the Sublime | 110
§ 27. | Of the quality of the satisfaction in our judgements upon the Sublime | 119
B.—Of the Dynamically Sublime in Nature | 123
§ 28. | Of Nature regarded as Might | 123
§ 29. | Of the modality of the judgement upon the sublime in nature | 130
General remark upon the exposition of the aesthetical reflective Judgement | 132
Deduction of [pure] aesthetical judgements | 150
§ 30. | The Deduction of aesthetical judgements on the objects of nature must not be directed to what we call Sublime in nature, but only to the Beautiful | 150
§ 31. | Of the method of deduction of judgements of taste | 152
§ 32. | First peculiarity of the judgement of taste | 154
§ 33. | Second peculiarity of the judgement of taste | 157
§ 34. | There is no objective principle of taste possible | 159
§ 35. | The principle of Taste is the subjective principle of Judgement in general | 161
§ 36. | Of the problem of a Deduction of judgements of Taste | 162
§ 37. | What is properly asserted a priori of an object in a judgement of taste | 164
§ 38. | Deduction of judgements of taste | 165
§ 39. | Of the communicability of a sensation | 167
§ 40. | Of taste as a kind of sensus communis | 169
§ 41. | Of the empirical interest in the Beautiful | 173
§ 42. | Of the intellectual interest in the Beautiful | 176
§ 43. | Of Art in general | 183
§ 44. | Of beautiful Art | 185
§ 45. | Beautiful art is an art in so far as it seems like nature | 187
§ 46. | Beautiful art is the art of genius | 188
§ 47. | Elucidation and confirmation of the above explanation of Genius | 190
§ 48. | Of the relation of Genius to Taste | 193
§ 49. | Of the faculties of the mind that constitute Genius | 197
§ 50. | Of the combination of Taste with Genius in the products of beautiful Art | 205
§ 51. | Of the division of the beautiful arts | 206
§ 52. | Of the combination of beautiful arts in one and the same product | 214
§ 53. | Comparison of the respective aesthetical worth of the beautiful arts | 215
§ 54. | Remark | 220
Second Division.—Dialectic of the Aesthetical Judgement | 229
§ 55. |  | 229
§ 56. | Representation of the antinomy of Taste | 230
§ 57. | Solution of the antinomy of Taste | 231
§ 58. | Of the Idealism of the purposiveness of both Nature and Art as the unique principle of the aesthetical Judgement | 241
§ 59. | Of Beauty as the symbol of Morality | 248
§ 60. | Appendix:—Of the method of Taste | 253
Second Part.—Critique of the Teleological Judgement | 257
§ 61. | Of the objective purposiveness of Nature | 259
First Division.—Analytic of the Teleological Judgement | 262
§ 62. | Of the objective purposiveness which is merely formal as distinguished from that which is material | 262
§ 63. | Of the relative, as distinguished from the inner, purposiveness of nature | 268
§ 64. | Of the peculiar character of things as natural purposes | 272
§ 65. | Things regarded as natural purposes are organised beings | 275
§ 66. | Of the principle of judging of internal purposiveness in organised beings | 280
§ 67. | Of the principle of the teleological judging of nature in general as a system of purposes | 282
§ 68. | Of the principle of Teleology as internal principle of natural science | 287
Second Division.—Dialectic of the Teleological Judgement | 292
§ 69. | What is an antinomy of the Judgement? | 292
§ 70. | Representation of this antinomy | 293
§ 71. | Preliminary to the solution of the above antinomy | 296
§ 72. | Of the different systems which deal with the purposiveness of Nature | 298
§ 73. | None of the above systems give what they pretend | 302
§ 74. | The reason that we cannot treat the concept of a Technic of nature dogmatically is the fact that a natural purpose is inexplicable | 306
§ 75. | The concept of an objective purposiveness of nature is a critical principle of Reason for the reflective Judgement | 309
§ 76. | Remark | 313
§ 77. | Of the peculiarity of the human Understanding, by means of which the concept of a natural purpose is possible | 319
§ 78. | Of the union of the principle of the universal mechanism of matter with the teleological principle in the Technic of nature | 326
Appendix.—Methodology of the Teleological Judgement | 334
§ 79. | Whether Teleology must be treated as if it belonged to the doctrine of nature | 334
§ 80. | Of the necessary subordination of the mechanical to the teleological principle in the explanation of a thing as a natural purpose | 336
§ 81. | Of the association of mechanism with the teleological principle in the explanation of a natural purpose as a natural product | 342
§ 82. | Of the teleological system in the external relations of organised beings | 346
§ 83. | Of the ultimate purpose of nature as a teleological system | 352
§ 84. | Of the final purpose of the existence of a world, i.e. of creation itself | 359
§ 85. | Of Physico-theology | 362
§ 86. | Of Ethico-theology | 370
§ 87. | Of the moral proof of the Being of God | 377
§ 88. | Limitation of the validity of the moral proof | 384
§ 89. | Of the use of the moral argument | 392
§ 90. | Of the kind of belief in a teleological proof of the Being of God | 395
§ 91. | Of the kind of belief produced by a practical faith | 403
General remark on Teleology | 414

К ВЕЧНОМУ МИРУ, ФИЛОСОФСКИЙ ОЧЕРК

Иммануил Кант

1795

Перевод, введение и примечания: М. Кэмпбелл Смит

CONTENTS

PAGE
PREFACE BY PROFESSOR LATTA | v
TRANSLATOR'S INTRODUCTION | 1
PERPETUAL PEACE | 106
FIRST SECTION CONTAINING THE PRELIMINARY ARTICLES OF PERPETUAL PEACE BETWEEN STATES | 107
SECOND SECTION CONTAINING THE DEFINITIVE ARTICLES OF PERPETUAL PEACE BETWEEN STATES | 117
FIRST SUPPLEMENT CONCERNING THE GUARANTEE OF PERPETUAL PEACE | 143
SECOND SUPPLEMENT-A SECRET ARTICLE FOR PERPETUAL PEACE | 158
APPENDIX I.-ON THE DISAGREEMENT BETWEEN MORALS AND POLITICS WITH REFERENCE TO PERPETUAL PEACE | 161
APPENDIX II.-CONCERNING THE HARMONY OF POLITICS WITH MORALS ACCORDING TO THE TRANSCENDENTAL IDEA OF PUBLIC RIGHT | 184
INDEX | 197

ПРОЛЕГОМЕНЫ

Иммануил Кант

Редактор английского издания: д-р Пол Карус

CONTENTS

PUBLISHERS' PREFACE.

INTRODUCTION.

PROLEGOMENA.

PREAMBLE ON THE PECULIARITIES OF ALL METAPHYSICAL COGNITION.

FIRST PART OF THE TRANSCENDENTAL PROBLEM.

HOW IS PURE MATHEMATICS POSSIBLE?

SECOND PART OF THE TRANSCENDENTAL PROBLEM.

HOW IS THE SCIENCE OF NATURE POSSIBLE?

THIRD PART OF THE MAIN TRANSCENDENTAL PROBLEM.

HOW IS METAPHYSICS IN GENERAL POSSIBLE?

SCHOLIA.

SOLUTION OF THE GENERAL QUESTION OF THE PROLEGOMENA, "HOW IS METAPHYSICS POSSIBLE AS A SCIENCE?"

APPENDIX.

back